Hisashi Moriguchi was besieged by reporters after giving a        press conference retracting his claims.      
        J. Sato/Getty      
    Rarely has such a spectacular scientific claim been debunked so    rapidly. For a few brief hours last week, Hisashi Moriguchi, a    project researcher at the University of Tokyo, was riding high,    lauded by his nations press for pioneering work on induced    pluripotent stem (iPS) cells. His feat was said to be the first    successful use in humans of a technology that days earlier had    won his countryman, Kyoto Universitys Shinya Yamanaka, a share    of the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine1.  
    Yet a swift investigation by Nature and several    stem-cell researchers found that Moriguchis claim to have    cured six heart-failure patients with cells derived from iPS    cells was untrue; that he had lied about his university    affiliations; and that he had plagiarized key parts of his    research papers2. At a hastily    convened press conference on 13 October, Moriguchi recanted. I    admit that I lied, he told reporters, adding that his career    as a researcher is probably over.  
    The sad episode could be written off as one researchers    runaway fantasy. But it highlights the febrile nature of the    iPS-cell field, particularly in Japan. Many researchers fear    that the therapeutic promise of these cellswhich    could open the way to creating replacement tissues to treat    diseasewill spur a premature rush to clinical    applications before their safety and efficacy can be proven.  
    The story kicked off when Moriguchis claims were splashed over    the front page of Yomiuri Shimbunthe    highest-circulation newspaper in the worldon    11October. He described how he had reprogrammed patients    liver cells into an embryonic state, with the potential to    develop into many different cell types. After converting these    iPS cells into heart-muscle cells, he supposedly injected them    into six patients in the United States to successfully repair    their damaged heart tissue.  
    But inconsistencies in the account quickly became apparent.    Alerted by Nature, Harvard Medical School and the    Massachusetts General Hospital, both in Boston, denied that the    procedures had taken place there, or that Moriguchi was    affiliated with them, as he had claimed. In an interview with    Nature, Moriguchi could not provide details of the    ethics review board that had approved the procedures; the    source of the clinical-grade cells; or the names of    collaborators. He claimed to have carried out an incredible    range of activities almost single-handedly and described    unconventional and unlikely methods for producing the cells.    Yet he trained as a nurse, lacks a medical degree, and his most    recent research was in medical economics. Nature also    discovered that the publications that Moriguchi had used to    support his claims3, 4 contained technical images copied from other    sources, as well as plagiarized passages from other    articles5, 6.    We are all doing similar things, so it makes sense that wed    use similar words, Moriguchi told Nature.  
    On 13 October, the day after Nature ran its    expos2, Moriguchi held a press    conference in New York, where he had been attending a meeting    of the New York Stem Cell Foundation. He admitted that most of    his claims were untrue, but maintained that he had injected    iPS-cell-derived heart cells into one patient, and that he    could produce notes to prove it. The University of Tokyo and    the Tokyo Dental and Medical University, where Moriguchi    claimed to have carried out collaborative studies, have    subsequently launched investigations into the affair. Nature    Publishing Group, which has published papers by Moriguchi in    its journal Scientific Reports, says that it is aware    of the issues surrounding these publications and is    investigating.  
    Researchers trying to understand why Moriguchi would engage in    such reckless fabrication have noted a climate that allows such    claims to gain prominence with little challenge. Since    Yamanakas discovery of iPS cells in 2006, some Japanese media    and government officials have taken a highly competitive tone    about the technology. In its original article about Moriguchis    claims, Yomiuri Shimbun noted that a burdensome    regulatory system was holding back Japans clinical research    relative to the United States, and, in a 2009 correspondence    published in Nature7,    Moriguchi argued that Japan is in danger of being overtaken in    the field of human iPS-cell research.  
    Scientists, journalists and regulators here need to be    especially careful not to let their pride in Yamanakas    achievement affect their critical faculties, or overwhelm them    in national fervour, says Douglas Sipp, who researches    stem-cell ethics and regulation at the RIKEN Center for    Developmental Biology in Kobe, Japan.  
View original post here:
Stem-cell fraud hits febrile field