Category Archives: Stell Cell Research

NDA Partners Expert Consultant Ellen Areman, Receives AABB Award for Major Contributions to the Field of Cellular Therapies – PR Web

I am honored to receive this award for my work in the exciting field of cellular therapies and look forward to continuing to contribute in any way I can to this rapidly growing field and to supporting companies who are developing new cell therapy and regenerative medicine products.

ROCHELLE, Va. (PRWEB) October 07, 2020

NDA Partners Chief Executive Officer Earle Martin announced today that Ellen Areman, one of the firms prominent Expert Consultants, was recently honored by AABB, formerly the American Association of Blood Banks, with the 2020 Emily Cooley Memorial Award and Lectureship. The award recognizes an individual who has demonstrated teaching ability and has made a major contribution to the field of transfusion medicine or cellular therapies. Ms. Areman was recognized for her pioneering work spanning more than 30 years in the field of cellular therapies and for serving as a role model and teacher to several generations of technologists, clinicians, and researchers.

Throughout her career, Ms. Aremans contributions to cellular therapies have been numerous including her career at the US Food and Drug Administrations Office of Cellular, Tissue, and Gene Therapy as an Expert Biologist and Product Reviewer, co-chair of the Cord Blood Standards subgroup of the Center for Biologics Research and Evaluations Hematopoietic Stem Cell Task Group, and the FDA- CBER/NIH-NHLBI Cell Therapy Working Group. She was also the coordinator of the cell processing section of the National Institutes of Healths Clinical Center Department of Transfusion Medicine, and has worked as the Laboratory Manager for both the Georgetown University/ NHLBI (COBLT) Cord Blood Bank and Pediatric Cancer and Stem Cell Research Program, as well as Technical Director of Georgetowns Cellular Engineering/Molecular and Cellular Hematotherapy Laboratory. She joined NDA Partners as an Expert Consultant in 2015 and provides regulatory strategy and CMC support to companies developing biological products including hematopoietic, immunologic, and stem cell therapies.

I am honored to receive this award for my work in the exciting field of cellular therapies and look forward to continuing to contribute in any way I can to this rapidly growing field and to supporting companies who are developing new cell therapy and regenerative medicine products, said Ms. Areman.

Ms. Areman earned her masters degree in pathology from Georgetown University, bachelors degree from The State University of New York at Albany, and specialist certification in blood banking from the National Institutes of Health. She is a member of AABB and a founding member of the International Society for Cell Therapies. She has also published extensively on biological products including serving as editor of Cellular Therapy: Principles, Methods and Regulations.

About NDA Partners NDA Partners is a life sciences management consulting and contract development organization (CDO) focused on providing product development and regulatory services to the pharmaceutical, biotechnology, and medical device industries worldwide. The highly experienced Principals and Expert Consultants in NDA Partners include three former FDA Center Directors; the former Chief Executive Officer and Chief Science Officer at the United States Pharmacopeial Convention (USP); an international team of more than 100 former pharmaceutical industry and regulatory agency senior executives; and an extensive roster of highly proficient experts in specialized areas including nonclinical development, toxicology, pharmacokinetics, CMC, medical device design control and quality systems, clinical development, regulatory submissions, and development program management. Services include product development and regulatory strategy, expert consulting, high-impact project teams, and contract management of client product development programs.

Contact Earle Martin, Chief Executive Officer Office: 540-738-2550 MartinEarle@ndapartners.com

Share article on social media or email:

Read this article:
NDA Partners Expert Consultant Ellen Areman, Receives AABB Award for Major Contributions to the Field of Cellular Therapies - PR Web

Company of the Year 2020: Bristol-Myers Squibb Patience Rewarded – PharmaLive

Five years after the companys portfolio bottomed out, Bristol-Myers Squibb markets three of the worlds six best-selling pharma brands.

By Joshua Slatko [emailprotected]

Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.

430 E. 29th Street, 14th Floor New York, NY 10016 Phone: 212-546-4000 Website: bms.com

FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE

(All figures are in millions of dollars, except EPS)

2019

Revenue $26,145

Net income $3,460

Diluted EPS $2.01

R&D expense $6,148

1H 2020

Revenue $20,910

Net income $(846)

Diluted EPS $(0.38)

R&D expense $4,894

BEST-SELLING Rx PRODUCTS

(All sales are in millions of dollars)

2019

Eliquis $7,929

Opdivo $7,204

Orencia $2,977

Sprycel $2,110

Yervoy $1,489

Revlimid $1,299*

Baraclude $555

* Sales with BMS after completion of the Celgene acquisition in November 2019.

1H 2020

Revlimid $5,799

Eliquis $4,804

Opdivo $3,419

Orencia $1,464

Pomalyst/Imnovid $1,458

Sprycel $1,032

Yervoy $765

Abraxane $608

Vidaza $284

Outcomes Creativity Index Score: 0 Manny Awards N/A Cannes Lions N/A LIA: Health & Wellness N/A Clio Health N/A One Show: HW&P N/A MM&M Awards N/A Global Awards N/A Creative Floor Awards N/A

When Giovanni Caforio, MD, took over as CEO of Bristol-Myers Squibb in May 2015, the companys annual top-line revenue had just fallen below $16 billion and its leading product, the $2 billion Abilify, had gone generic the month before. But the seeds of future success had already been planted. Opdivo earned the drugs first approval from FDA in December 2014, sales of Eliquis had just more than quadrupled to $774 million, and BMS was starting to look like it might really be what the leadership team had been starting to call it: an Immuno-Oncology company. Having risen through the companys oncology divisions, Dr. Caforio was the man for the moment. Five years later, Opdivo is the worlds third-best-selling oncologic, Eliquis is the worlds leading cardiovascular brand, and BMS acquisition of Celgene a move that would have been barely conceivable back in 2015 has brought the $10 billion oncology brand Revlimid into the fold as well, alongside Pomalyst (tracking towards $3 billion in annual sales), the recently approved products Reblozyl, Zeposia and Onureg, and the high-potential developmental CAR T compounds liso-cel and ide-cel, among others. For this extraordinary turnaround, for the courageous and ultimately successful all-in bets on Opdivo and Eliquis, and for the aggressive pursuit and capture of Celgene to firm up both the top line and the pipeline, Med Ad News is pleased to name Bristol-Myers Squibb as Company of the Year.

By all measures, 2019 was a transformative year for Bristol-Myers Squibb as we progressed our strategy through the acquisition of Celgene, delivered strong operational and financial performance, and continued to drive important science for patients, said Giovanni Caforio, MD, CEO of Bristol-Myers Squibb.

By all measures, 2019 was a transformative year for Bristol-Myers Squibb as we progressed our strategy through the acquisition of Celgene, delivered strong operational and financial performance, and continued to drive important science for patients, Dr. Caforio said at the end of 2019. With an expanded portfolio of high-performing brands, eight potential commercial launch opportunities, a deep and broad early pipeline, and the financial flexibility to continue to invest in innovation, the company enters 2020 uniquely positioned to transform patients lives through science and create long-term sustainable growth.

Helped along by a month and change of legacy Celgene revenue, BMS top line in 2019 was $26.15 billion, an improvement of 15.9 percent compared with the previous year. Due in part to the impact of amortization of acquired intangible assets and other costs from the Celgene transaction, though, net income for the year declined 30.1 percent to $3.46 billion and diluted earnings per share were down a dollar to $2.01. In the first half of 2020, the first full half of legacy Celgene, top-line sales were up by 71.5 percent to $20.91 billion. However, due to more amortization of acquired intangible assets $4.67 billion of it and other Celgene-related costs, net income fell into the red at negative $846 million and EPS was -$0.38. BMS executives are estimating that full-year EPS for 2020 will fall between -$0.06 and $0.09; without all the one-time Celgene charges and costs, though, they are projecting full-year 2020 EPS at between $6.10 and $6.25.

Acquisitions &partnerships

In January, BMS and Nektar Therapeutics announced a new joint development plan to advance bempegaldesleukin (bempeg) plus Opdivo into multiple new registrational trials.

The revision to the companies strategic collaboration agreement includes a new joint development plan under which Nektar and Bristol-Myers Squibb will expand the active clinical development program for bempeg plus nivolumab from three ongoing registrational trials in first-line metastatic melanoma, first-line cisplatin-ineligible metastatic urothelial cancer and first-line metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) to include two additional registrational trials in adjuvant melanoma and in muscle-invasive bladder cancer. In addition, a Phase I/II dose escalation and expansion study will be initiated to evaluate bempeg plus nivolumab in combination with axitinib in first-line RCC in order to support a future registrational trial. The costs for these studies will be shared based upon the cost-sharing outlined in the terms of the original collaboration agreement. Also as part of the new strategic collaboration agreement, Bristol-Myers Squibb will independently conduct and fund a Phase I/II dose optimization and expansion study in first-line non-small-cell lung cancer with bempeg and nivolumab.

In February, BMS and BioMotiv, a mission-driven drug development accelerator associated with The Harrington Project for discovery and development, that advances breakthrough discoveries from research institutions into therapeutics, announced the launch of Anteros Pharmaceuticals, a biotechnology company focused on developing a new class of drugs for fibrotic and other inflammatory diseases. The intellectual property behind Anteros was first developed by Yale University and in-licensed by Bristol-Myers Squibb and subsequently assigned to Anteros. This is the first company BioMotiv and Bristol-Myers Squibb have launched since executing their Strategic Partnership Agreement, as previously announced in September 2019.

Under the terms of the partnership, Bristol-Myers Squibb is contributing the IP, data, and reagents for a series of small molecules against an undisclosed mechanism, and BioMotiv, through the formation of Anteros Pharmaceuticals, working in close partnership with Yale, is solely responsible for research and development. Once Anteros nominates a pre-clinical candidate, Bristol-Myers Squibb has the option to acquire the company from BioMotiv under pre-agreed terms.

During March, Bristol-Myers Squib and Voluntis announced a collaboration agreement to create and investigate digital therapeutic solutions that will support cancer patients. Taking advantage of Theraxium Oncology, Voluntis core platform for digital therapeutics in oncology, the collaboration is evaluating potential solutions that will support management of patient symptoms and remote monitoring by healthcare providers.

According to company leaders, the goal is that the digital therapeutic, once researched and developed, would provide patients access to a mobile app that would support treatment and track symptoms. The app will be developed to embed evidence-based algorithms intended to provide patients with real-time recommendations for self-management of symptoms related to their therapy. The parties will also investigate how the solution could enable patients to more effectively communicate with their health care providers, capture and track symptoms, and receive a personalized supportive care plan.

In August 2020, BMS and Forbius, a privately held, clinical-stage protein engineering company that designs and develops biotherapeutics for the treatment of cancer and fibrotic diseases, announced that they had entered into a definitive agreement under which Bristol-Myers Squibb would acquire Forbius. The acquisition was completed during September.

Forbius has developed a portfolio of highly selective and potent inhibitors of TGF-beta 1 and 3, which are key mediators of immunosuppression and fibrosis. The transaction included an upfront payment and future success-based milestone payments. Prior to closing, Forbius non-TGF-beta assets were transferred to a newly formed private company, which is retained by Forbius existing shareholders.

Under this transaction, Bristol-Myers Squibb acquired Forbius TGF-beta program, including the programs lead investigational asset, AVID200. TGF-beta is a key cytokine that regulates various cell processes, including regulation of the immune system. Selective inhibition of TGF-beta 1 and 3 may enhance anti-tumor efficacy by acting synergistically with immunotherapy. AVID200 is undergoing Phase 1 development for oncology and fibrosis.

Also in August, BMS and Dragonfly Therapeutics Inc. announced that they had entered into a definitive agreement under which Bristol-Myers Squibb would be granted the global exclusive license to Dragonflys interleukin-12 (IL-12) investigational immunotherapy program, including its extended half-life cytokine DF6002. DF6002 is a monovalent IL-12 immunoglobulin Fc fusion protein proposed to achieve strong anti-tumor efficacy by establishing an inflammatory tumor microenvironment necessary for productive anti-tumor responses.

Under the agreement, Bristol-Myers Squibb is responsible for the development and any subsequent commercialization of DF6002 and its related products worldwide, including strategic decisions, regulatory responsibilities, funding, and manufacturing. Dragonfly will receive $475 million in near-term upfronts, and is eligible to receive performance-based development, regulatory and commercial milestone payments. In addition, Dragonfly will receive up to 24 percent royalties on worldwide net sales.

The Opdivo development train continued to roll during 2020, with two additional FDA approvals in NSCLC and another in HCC.

Dragonfly received FDA clearance in May 2020 for its investigational new drug application to develop DF6002. In addition, Dragonfly has an ongoing Phase I/II clinical trial for patients with advanced solid tumors, which began in July 2020. BMS intends to advance the research and development of DF6002 in oncology and hematology.

Opdivo

Sales of the oncologic Opdivo rose 7 percent in 2019 to $7.2 billion. While international sales were up by 15 percent due to higher demand as a result of approvals for additional indications in 2018 and launches in Europe and Asia, sales growth in the United States was 2 percent, primarily due to a smaller previously treated advanced lung cancer market and increased competition for the Opdivo+Yervoy combination in kidney cancer. Company leaders expect this trend to continue until the market stabilizes or new indications are approved and launched. In the first half of 2020 sales of Opdivo declined by 5.7 percent to $3.42 billion. According to company leaders, this was again due to the smaller previously treated advanced lung cancer market, as well as lower demand due to COVID-19, primarily lower new patient starts and patient visits.

In February, BMS announced five-year follow-up results from the Phase III CheckMate -025 study, which continue to demonstrate that treatment with Opdivo delivers superior overall survival (OS) rate and objective response rate (ORR) in patients with previously treated advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma compared to those treated with everolimus.

With an extended minimum follow-up of 64 months, patients treated with Opdivo continued to demonstrate OS benefit with 26 percent of patients alive compared to 18 percent of patients treated with everolimus. Additionally, the percentage of patients experiencing an objective response was 23 percent for Opdivo versus 4 percent for everolimus and the median duration of response for Opdivo was also maintained longer than for everolimus (18.2 months versus 14 months, respectively).

Also in February, BMS announced updated results from the Phase III CheckMate -214 study evaluating the combination of Opdivo plus Yervoy versus sunitinib in patients with previously untreated advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma. With a minimum follow-up of 42 months, the combination of Opdivo plus Yervoy continued to show superior OS, ORR, duration of response, and complete response rates.

Sales of Yervoy in the first half of 2020 rose by 1.9 percent to $765 million.

A significant OS benefit was observed in both patients from the intermediate- and poor-risk and the intent-to-treat populations treated with Opdivo plus Yervoy compared to those treated with sunitinib alone. Of the patients treated with Opdivo plus Yervoy who experienced a complete response, per independent review, that response was ongoing in 84 percent and 86 percent of patients in the IP and ITT populations, respectively.

More than half of advanced RCC patients treated with the Opdivo plus Yervoy combination were alive after four years across the entire study population of the Phase 3 CheckMate -214 trial, as reported by Bristol-Myers Squibb in September 2020. With the longest follow-up for an immunotherapy-based combination in previously untreated advanced RCC, Opdivo plus Yervoy continued to demonstrate superior, long-term OS and durable responses versus sunitinib. These sustained benefits were observed across the primary patient population, those with intermediate- and poor-risk prognostic factors, and in the intention-to-treat (ITT, i.e. all randomized) patient population.

During March, FDA approved Opdivo 1 mg/kg plus Yervoy 3 mg/kg (injections for intravenous use) to treat hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients who have been previously treated with sorafenib. Approval for this indication was granted under accelerated approval based on overall response rate and duration of response seen in the Opdivo + Yervoy cohort of the Phase I/II CheckMate -040 trial. Continued approval for this indication may be contingent upon verification and description of clinical benefit in confirmatory trials. Opdivo + Yervoy is the only dual immunotherapy approved by FDA in this setting. The therapy features a potentially synergistic mechanism of action that targets two different checkpoints (PD-1 and CTLA-4) and works in complementary ways.

In the CheckMate -040 cohort of HCC patients previously treated with sorafenib, after a minimum follow up of 28 months, 33 percent of patients responded to treatment with Opdivo + Yervoy; 8 percent had a complete response, and 24 percent had a partial response. Duration of responses ranged from 4.6 to 30.5-plus months, with 88 percent lasting at least six months, 56 percent at least 12 months, and 31 percent at least 24 months. Overall response rate and DOR were assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. ORR assessed by BICR using modified RECIST was 35 percent, with a CR reported in 12 percent of patients and a PR reported in 22 percent of patients.

In April, BMS and Exelixis Inc. announced that CheckMate -9ER, a pivotal Phase III trial evaluating Opdivo in combination with Cabometyx compared to sunitinib in previously untreated advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma, met its primary endpoint of progression-free survival (PFS) at final analysis, as well as the secondary endpoints of OS at a pre-specified interim analysis, and ORR.

CheckMate -9ER results were reported in September in which Opdivo in combination with Cabometyx showed superior OS and doubled median PFS and ORR with a favorable safety profile compared to sunitinib.

In May, FDA approved Opdivo 360 mg plus Yervoy 1 mg/kg (injections for intravenous use) given with two cycles of platinum-doublet chemotherapy for the first-line treatment of adult patients with metastatic or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer with no EGFR or ALK genomic tumor aberrations. The therapy was approved for patients with squamous or non-squamous disease and regardless of PD-L1 expression. This application was reviewed under FDAs Real-Time Oncology Review pilot program, which aims to ensure that safe and effective treatments are available to patients as early as possible.

This approval for Opdivo + Yervoy with limited chemotherapy was based on the pre-specified interim analysis from the Phase III CheckMate -9LA trial in which Opdivo + Yervoy combined with two cycles of platinum-doublet chemotherapy demonstrated superior OS versus chemotherapy regardless of PD-L1 expression or tumor histology (minimum 8.1 months follow up). Median OS was 14.1 months versus 10.7 months, respectively. In a follow-up analysis at 12.7 months, the hazard ratio improved numerically to 0.66, with mOS of 15.6 months and 10.9 months. At one year, 63 percent of patients treated with Opdivo + Yervoy with limited chemotherapy and 47 percent of those treated with chemotherapy were still alive.

Also in May, FDA approved Opdivo 3 mg/kg plus Yervoy 1 mg/kg (injections for intravenous use) for the first-line treatment of adults with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer whose tumors express PD-L1 (1 percent) as determined by an FDA-approved test, with no EGFR or ALK genomic tumor aberrations.

This approval was based on Part 1a of the Phase III CheckMate -227 trial in which Opdivo + Yervoy demonstrated superior OS versus chemotherapy regardless of tumor histology with a minimum follow up of 29.3 months. The median OS was 17.1 months versus 14.9 months. In the trial, 63 percent of patients treated with Opdivo + Yervoy and 56 percent treated with chemotherapy were alive at one year, and 40 percent and 33 percent at two years, respectively. At three years (median 43.1 months follow up), 33 percent of patients treated with Opdivo + Yervoy and 22 percent of those treated with chemotherapy were still alive. As assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review, the confirmed overall response rate with a minimum follow up of 28.3 months was 36 percent with Opdivo + Yervoy (5.8 percent complete response and 30.1 percent partial response) and 30 percent with chemotherapy (1.8 percent CR and 28.2 percent PR). Among patients who responded, the median duration of response was 23.2 months for patients treated with Opdivo + Yervoy and 6.2 months for chemotherapy.

In June, FDA approved Opdivo for the treatment of patients with unresectable advanced, recurrent, or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after prior fluoropyrimidine- and platinum-based chemotherapy. This application was granted Priority Review Designation by FDA, and the approval was based on the Phase III ATTRACTION-3 trial in which Opdivo demonstrated superior OS versus taxane chemotherapy (investigators choice of docetaxel or paclitaxel). The median OS was 10.9 months for Opdivo compared to 8.4 months for docetaxel or paclitaxel. Opdivo is the first approved immunotherapy in this setting regardless of tumor PD-L1 expression level.

In August 2020, BMS announced that the Phase III CheckMate -577 trial evaluating Opdivo as an adjuvant therapy for patients with resected esophageal or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer met its primary endpoint of disease-free survival at a pre-specified interim analysis. In the trial, treatment with Opdivo following neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy and complete surgical resection demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in the primary endpoint of disease-free survival (DFS) compared to placebo in the all-randomized population. The safety profile of Opdivo was consistent with previously reported studies. This is the second tumor, in addition to melanoma, where Opdivo has demonstrated a benefit in the adjuvant setting.

Bristol-Myers Squibb announced results in September from the Phase 3 CheckMate -577 trial in which adjuvant treatment with Opdivo demonstrated a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in DFS compared to placebo in patients with esophageal or GEJ cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy and tumor resection.

BMS announced during August that CheckMate -649, a pivotal Phase III trial evaluating Opdivo plus chemotherapy compared to chemotherapy alone as a first-line treatment for metastatic gastric cancer, GEJ cancer or esophageal adenocarcinoma, met both primary endpoints of OS at a pre-specified interim analysis and progression-free survival at final analysis in patients whose tumors express PD-L1 with a combined positive score 5. The OS benefit was also observed in the all-randomized population. Opdivo is the first PD-1 inhibitor to demonstrate superior OS and PFS in combination with chemotherapy when compared to chemotherapy alone in patients with gastric cancer, GEJ, cancer or esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Bristol Myers Squibb reported in September primary results from CheckMate -649 in which first-line treatment with Opdivo plus chemotherapy demonstrated a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in OS and PFS of patients with unresectable advanced or metastatic gastric cancer, GEJ cancer or esophageal adenocarcinoma compared to treatment with chemotherapy alone.

In early October 2020, Opdivo 360 mg every three weeks plus Yervoy 1 mg/kg every six weeks was approved by the U.S. FDA for the first-line treatment of adult patients with unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). The U.S. approval is based on a pre-specified interim analysis from the Phase 3 CheckMate -743 trial in which Opdivo + Yervoy (n=303) demonstrated superior overall survival versus the platinum-based standard of care chemotherapy, with a median OS of 18.1 months (95 percent CI: 16.8 to 21.5) versus 14.1 months (95 percent CI: 12.5 to 16.2), respectively. These results were observed after 22.1 months of minimum follow-up, according to Bristol-Myers Squibb. At two years, 41 percent of patients treated with Opdivo + Yervoy were alive and 27 percent with chemotherapy.

Eliquis took over as the worlds top-selling cardiovascular medicine in 2019 with sales of $7.93 billion.

Opdivo + Yervoy is the first new systemic therapy in more than 15 years to be approved by the FDA in this setting. The marketing approval marks the third indication for Opdivo + Yervoy-based treatments in thoracic cancers and seventh indication overall.

Other productperformances

The cardiovascular drug Eliquis took over as BMS leading brand by revenue in 2019 with growth of 23.2 percent and sales of $7.93 billion for the year, passing Xarelto to become the worlds No. 1 cardiovascular brand. According to BMS executives, U.S. sales of Eliquis increased due to higher demand, partially offset by higher Medicare Part D coverage gap cost share, while international sales rose due to higher demand. In the first half of 2020 sales of Eliquis rose another 21.1 percent to $4.8 billion. Eliquis is indicated for the prevention of stroke in adults with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, and the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism disorders.

The autoimmune product Orencia generated sales of $2.98 billion for BMS in 2019, an improvement of 9.9 percent. According to company leaders, this was driven by higher demand and higher average net selling price. Sales of Orencia in the first half of 2020 edged up by 3.2 percent to $1.46 billion, slowed by the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Orencia is indicated for adult patients with moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis and is also indicated for reducing signs and symptoms in certain pediatric patients with moderately to severely active polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

In June, BMS announced results from the open-label switch period of Early AMPLE, a Phase IV exploratory biomarker study assessing the differences by which Orencia and another treatment, adalimumab, interfere with disease progression in moderate-to-severe early rheumatoid arthritis patients who tested positive (seropositive) for certain autoantibodies. Findings of the open-label switch period showed that early seropositive RA patients treated with Orencia demonstrated substantial clinical improvements at week 48, sustaining the level of responses achieved at week 24 compared to adalimumab. In seropositive patients switching from adalimumab to Orencia, the efficacy responses generally increased over the open-label period to week 48.

The efficacy responses observed at 24 weeks with Orencia were sustained at week 48 in the patients who continued on Orencia. At week 48, ACR 20/50/70 responses with Orencia in the non-switch arm were 78, 63, and 50, respectively. At week 24, ACR 20/50/70 responses with Orencia were 83, 73, and 50, respectively; ACR 20/50/70 scores for adalimumab at week 24 were 63, 45, and 30, respectively.

In the patients who switched from adalimumab to Orencia, while the trial was not powered to show superiority or non-inferiority, the efficacy responses generally increased over the open-label period through week 48. ACR 20/50/70 scores for patients who switched from adalimumab to Orencia were 75, 63, and 38, respectively, at week 48.

Overall, patients with a well-known genetic marker of RA prognosis, called the Shared Epitope, who continued on Orencia achieved numerically higher responses than the broader seropositive patient population at week 48, indicating the potential importance of SE as a predictor of response to Orencia. ACR 20/50/70 responses were 77, 67 and 53, respectively, for SE+ patients continuing on Orencia.

Sales of the leukemia drug Sprycel rose by 5.5 percent in 2019 to $2.11 billion. Company leaders said this was due to higher average net selling price and higher demand in the United States. In the first half of 2020, Sprycel sales rose 2.9 percent to $1.03 billion, with demand declining in the United States and generic competition internationally. Sprycel is indicated for the first-line treatment of adults with Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase and the treatment of adults with chronic, accelerated, or myeloid or lymphoid blast phase CML with resistance or intolerance to prior therapy.

The oncologic Yervoy generated $1.49 billion in sales for BMS in 2019, an improvement of 12 percent. According to company executives, this was due to higher demand and higher average net selling price in the United States and approvals for additional indications and launches primarily in Europe and Japan in 2018 internationally. Sales of Yervoy in the first half of 2020 rose by 1.9 percent to $765 million, held back by increased competition for the Opdivo + Yervoy combination for kidney cancer.

After joining the BMS portfolio via the Celgene acquisition, the oncologic Revlimid is trending towards more than $11 billion in revenue in 2020.

While they did not have time to add much to BMS 2019 numbers since the Celgene deal closed in November, two legacy Celgene products are going to have a major impact on BMS top line in 2020: Revlimid and Pomalyst/Imnovid. Revlimid, the worlds leading oncology drug by revenue in 2018, generated $10.82 billion in sales and growth of 11.7 percent between Celgene and BMS in 2019, losing its oncology crown only because Mercks Keytruda grew faster. In the first half of 2020 sales of Revlimid were $5.8 billion, up 9.2 percent compared with the medicines first-half 2019 amount while still under the Celgene umbrella. The multiple myeloma drug Pomalyst generated sales of more than $2.16 billion in 2019 the numbers are a bit unclear due to the timing of the Celgene acquisition and brought in another $1.46 billion in the first half of 2020, up 24 percent compared with the drugs first-half 2019 performance at Celgene. Revlimid is indicated in combination with dexamethasone for the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma and as a single agent as a maintenance therapy in patients with multiple myeloma following autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Pomalyst is indicated for patients with multiple myeloma who have received at least two prior therapies including lenalidomide and a proteasome inhibitor and have demonstrated disease progression on or within 60 days of completion of the last therapy.

In May, FDA approved Pomalyst for patients with AIDS-related Kaposi sarcoma whose disease has become resistant to highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), or in patients with Kaposi sarcoma who are HIV-negative. Pomalyst was granted accelerated approval, Breakthrough Therapy designation and Orphan Drug designation in these indications based on overall response rates observed in a Phase I/II open label, single-arm clinical trial (12-C-0047). Continued approval may be contingent upon verification and description of clinical benefit in a confirmatory trial. Pomalyst is the first new treatment option available for those with Kaposi sarcoma in more than 20 years.

The legacy Celgene oncologic Pomalyst enjoyed sales growth of nearly a quarter in the first half of 2020 and earned a new indication from FDA for AIDS-related Kaposi sarcoma.

Original post:
Company of the Year 2020: Bristol-Myers Squibb Patience Rewarded - PharmaLive

Animal Stem Cell Therapy Market – Great Growth Opportunities for the Market in the Coming Year | TMR Research Study – BioSpace

Advances in the stem cell therapy sector have been phenomenal over the years. Its assistance in curing humans of various diseases and disorders has generated expansive advancements. These advancements are not just limited to humans. Stem cell therapy has also acquired a prominent place in the veterinary sector.

The influence of animal stem cell therapy for the treatment of various animals for diverse diseases and disorders is growing rapidly. Therefore, this factor may help the global animal stem cell therapy market to generate exponential growth across the forecast period of 2019-2029. Stem cells help in the replacement of neurons affected by stroke, Parkinsons disease, spinal cord injury, Alzheimers disease, and others.

Get Brochure of the Report @ https://www.tmrresearch.com/sample/sample?flag=B&rep_id=6816

This animal stem cell therapy market report has extensive information on various aspects associated with bringing growth. Important factors such as emerging trends, mergers and acquisitions, and the regional scenario of the animal stem cell therapy market have been analyzed and included in the report. The stakeholders can derive a treasure of information from this report. This report also includes a scrutinized take on the COVID-19 impact on the animal stem cell therapy market.

Animal Stem Cell Therapy Market: Competitive Prospects

The competitive landscape of the animal stem cell therapy market can be described as mildly fragmented. With a considerable chunk of players, the animal stem cell therapy market is surrounded by substantial competition. Research and development activities form an important part of the growth landscape because they help gain novel insights.

Activities such as mergers, acquisitions, joint ventures, collaborations, and partnerships form the foundation of the growth of the animal stem cell therapy market. These activities help manufacturers to gain influence and eventually help in increasing the growth rate of the animal stem cell therapy market. Prominent participants in the animal stem cell therapy market are Magellan Stem Cells, Medivet Biologics LLC, Kintaro Cells Power, U.S. Stem Cell, Inc., Celavet Inc., VETSTEM BIOPHARMA, and VetCell Therapeutics.

Buy this Premium Report @ https://www.tmrresearch.com/checkout?rep_id=6816&ltype=S

Animal Stem Cell Therapy Market: Key Trends

Infections are scaling up among animals at a rapid rate. The alarming increase is proving fatal for many animals. Therefore, to avoid such incidences and treat existing diseases and disorders, animal stem cell therapy is being applied seamlessly. Hence, this aspect may bring great growth opportunities for the animal stem cell therapy market.

Developments have been observed across the animal stem cell therapy market for long. Autologous adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells are gaining traction for successfully resolving a range of issues in animals. These stem cells help in treating ligament and tendon injuries to a certain extent. The strengthening influence of this stem cell type in companion animals is also proving to be a prominent growth prospect for the animal stem cell therapy market.

Recent research has also found that stem cell-derived CC exosomes showed improved recovery from myocardial infarction (MI) among pigs. Such developments assure promising growth for the animal stem cell therapy market.

Animal Stem Cell Therapy Market: Regional Analysis

The animal stem cell therapy market is spread across North America, Latin America, the Middle East and Africa, Europe, and Asia Pacific. The animal stem cell therapy market may derive significant growth from North America. The escalating awareness regarding animal stem cell therapy may attract profound growth. Strengthening research and development activities in the region regarding animal stem cell therapy is further expanding the growth prospects.

Get Table of Content of the Report @ https://www.tmrresearch.com/sample/sample?flag=T&rep_id=6816

About TMR Research

TMR Research is a premier provider of customized market research and consulting services to business entities keen on succeeding in todays supercharged economic climate. Armed with an experienced, dedicated, and dynamic team of analysts, we are redefining the way our clients conduct business by providing them with authoritative and trusted research studies in tune with the latest methodologies and market trends.

Contact:

Rohit Bhisey

TMR Research,

3739 Balboa St # 1097,

San Francisco, CA 94121

United States

Tel: +1-415-520-1050

Visit Site: https://www.tmrresearch.com/

View original post here:
Animal Stem Cell Therapy Market - Great Growth Opportunities for the Market in the Coming Year | TMR Research Study - BioSpace

Bone Therapeutics, Link Health and Pregene to develop and commercialize the ALLOB allogeneic bone cell therapy platform in China and Southeast Asia -…

Gosselies, Belgium, 5 October 2020, 7am CEST BONE THERAPEUTICS(Euronext Brussels and Paris: BOTHE), the cell therapy company addressing unmet medical needs in orthopedics and other diseases, Link Health Pharma Co., Ltd (Link Health) and Shenzhen Pregene Biopharma Company, Ltd (Pregene) today announce the signing of an exclusive license agreement for the manufacturing, clinical development and commercialization of Bone Therapeutics allogeneic, off-the-shelf, bone cell therapy platform ALLOB in China (including Hong Kong and Macau), Taiwan, Singapore, South Korea, and Thailand.

Under the agreement, Bone Therapeutics is eligible to receive up to 55 million in development, regulatory and commercial milestone payments including 10 million in upfront and milestone payments anticipated in the next 24 months. Bone Therapeutics is also entitled to receive tiered double-digit royalties on annual net sales of ALLOB. Bone Therapeutics retains development and commercialization rights to ALLOB in all other geographies outside of those covered by this agreement. As a result, Bone Therapeutics will continue to concentrate on its development and commercialization plans for ALLOB in the US and Europe and novel innovative cell-based products globally.

This collaboration between Bone Therapeutics, Link Health and Pregene expands our geographic reach and demonstrates the global commercial potential of ALLOB,said Miguel Forte, MD, PhD, Chief Executive Officer of Bone Therapeutics. We already have operational experience in Asia with the Phase III clinical trial of our lead product JTA-004 in Hong Kong. We selected Link Health and Pregene to partner with us in Asia as a result of their expertise in advanced therapeutics and cell therapies, their proven track record of development and commercial implementation in Chinese and Asian markets, and Pregenes well established cell therapy manufacturing capacity. Bone Therapeutics will continue to develop the ALLOB cell therapy platform for other markets while exploring additional partnership opportunities in the U.S. and Europe.

The agreement grants Link Health and Pregene exclusive rights to clinically develop and commercialize ALLOB for the treatment of human bone disorders in Greater China, Taiwan, Singapore, South Korea, and Thailand. All rights for China will be transferred to Pregene and Link Health will gain rights for the remaining countries Bone Therapeutics will share its patented proprietary manufacturing expertise for the expansion and differentiation of bone-forming cells and has the option to sell clinical supplies to Link Health and Pregene in preparation for their clinical development of ALLOB.

This collaboration and license agreement for Bone Therapeutics ALLOB provides a strong addition to our pipeline. ALLOB has demonstrated the potential to reduce the recovery time and stimulate bone growth for a variety of bone conditions, and to have a considerable impact on patients lives,said Yan Song, PhD, Chief Executive Officer of Link Health. It is important for Link Health to collaborate with companies that have strong therapeutic product portfolios and entrepreneurial management. This partnership with Bone Therapeutics is a direct result of our shared commitment to appreciate the enormous potential of cell therapy and regenerative medicine.

Pregene now has a flourishing portfolio of CAR-T cell therapy-based cancer treatments. Bone Therapeutics ALLOB provides anallogeneic, off-the-shelf cell therapy that expands our portfolio of cell therapies to include the sizable commercial potential of orthopedics,said Hongjian Li, Co-founder and Chief Executive Officer of Pregene. We expect to be able to leverage our extensive international cell and gene therapy experience to develop Bone Therapeutics ALLOB platform and subsequently launch products in China and Southeast Asian markets.

ALLOB, an allogeneic and off-the-shelf cell therapy product manufactured through a proprietary, scalable production process, consists of human bone-forming cells derived from cultured bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells of healthy adult donors. In preclinical studies ALLOB has shown to reduce healing time in a delayed-union fracture model by half, and has demonstrated good tolerability and signs of efficacy in two Phase IIa studies for two separate indications. The Companys randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind Phase IIb clinical trial in patients with difficult tibial fractures has received approval from regulatory authorities in six of the seven planned European countries to date, and is expected to enroll the first patient later this year.

About Link Health Pharma Co., Ltd

Link Health is a leading Chinese pharmaceutical company based in Guangzhou, Southern China, focusing on the development of innovative drugs for unmet medical needs.

Link Health has created a highly professional team with diverse expertise in drug development, medical affairs and regulatory affairs. Leveraging deep understanding of China market, regulatory environment and strong network with global biopharmaceutical companies, Link Health is well positioned to bring innovative drugs to the market efficiently. The company has a drug development pipeline of 5 clinical stage assets and 1 under NDA reviewing in China.

The company has also established a fully owned subsidiary in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. The Dutch office builds and further strengthen collaborations with global pharma/biotech partners and research institutes.

About Pregene Biopharma Co., Ltd

Shenzhen Pregene Biopharma Co. Ltd is a leading enterprise in the cell and gene therapy field with the core technology for industrialization. The companys core team comes from well-known institutions and companies including the Academy of Military Medical Sciences, the University of Toronto, and the US FDA.

Pregene has established the gene editing platform, viral vector and cell production platform, nanobody selection platform and other small to pilot trial manufacturing system, with total investment over 100 million CNY. It has the laboratories and GMP plants for cell and gene therapy of over 10,000 square meter.

The company focuses on the research and development of cell and gene therapy drugs, and participated in the drafting the national standard Considerations for CAR-T Cell Quality Study and Non-clinical Evaluation issued by the National Institutes for Food and Drug Control in June 2018. The CAR-T cell therapy for the treatment of multiple myeloma have obtained NMPA IND clearance as the Class I new drug, which is the first in China and fastest in the world using the humanized single domain antibody in CAR construct, and phase I clinical trials are now in progress. Other pipelines such as CAR-T, TCR-T and mRNA drugs for tumors, autoimmune diseases and other indications are in the development at different stages. The company has broad development prospects with the abundant backup technologies.

Looking forward to the future, the company will build the core capacity in one-stop solution for cell and gene therapy drugs, and fulfill the Express of innovative medicine development from drug discovery to clinical products.

About Bone Therapeutics

Bone Therapeutics is a leading biotech company focused on the development of innovative products to address high unmet needs in orthopedics and other diseases. The Company has a, diversified portfolio of cell and biologic therapies at different stages ranging from pre-clinical programs in immunomodulation to mid-to-late stage clinical development for orthopedic conditions, targeting markets with large unmet medical needs and limited innovation.

Bone Therapeutics is developing an off-the-shelf next-generation improved viscosupplement, JTA-004, which is currently in phase III development for the treatment of pain in knee osteoarthritis. Consisting of a unique combination of plasma proteins, hyaluronic acid a natural component of knee synovial fluid, and a fast-acting analgesic, JTA-004 intends to provide added lubrication and protection to the cartilage of the arthritic joint and to alleviate osteoarthritic pain and inflammation. Positive phase IIb efficacy results in patients with knee osteoarthritis showed a statistically significant improvement in pain relief compared to a leading viscosupplement.

Bone Therapeutics core technology is based on its cutting-edge allogeneic cell therapy platform with differentiated bone marrow sourced Mesenchymal Stromal Cells (MSCs) which can be stored at the point of use in the hospital. Currently in pre-clinical development, BT-20, the most recent product candidate from this technology, targets inflammatory conditions, while the leading investigational medicinal product, ALLOB, represents a unique, proprietary approach to bone regeneration, which turns undifferentiated stromal cells from healthy donors into bone-forming cells. These cells are produced via the Bone Therapeutics scalable manufacturing process. Following the CTA approval by regulatory authorities in Europe, the Company is ready to start the phase IIb clinical trial with ALLOB in patients with difficult tibial fractures, using its optimized production process. ALLOB continues to be evaluated for other orthopedic indications including spinal fusion, osteotomy, maxillofacial and dental.

Bone Therapeutics cell therapy products are manufactured to the highest GMP standards and are protected by a broad IP (Intellectual Property) portfolio covering ten patent families as well as knowhow. The Company is based in the BioPark in Gosselies, Belgium. Further information is available atwww.bonetherapeutics.com.

For further information, please contact:

Bone Therapeutics SA Miguel Forte, MD, PhD, Chief Executive Officer Jean-Luc Vandebroek, Chief Financial Officer Tel: +32 (0)71 12 10 00 investorrelations@bonetherapeutics.com

For Belgian Media and Investor Enquiries: Bepublic Catherine Haquenne Tel: +32 (0)497 75 63 56 catherine@bepublic.be

International Media Enquiries: Image Box Communications Neil Hunter / Michelle Boxall Tel: +44 (0)20 8943 4685 neil.hunter@ibcomms.agency / michelle@ibcomms.agency

For French Media and Investor Enquiries: NewCap Investor Relations & Financial Communications Pierre Laurent, Louis-Victor Delouvrier and Arthur Rouill Tel: +33 (0)1 44 71 94 94 bone@newcap.eu

For US Media and Investor Enquiries: LHA Investor Relations Yvonne Briggs Tel: +1 310 691 7100 ybriggs@lhai.com

Certain statements, beliefs and opinions in this press release are forward-looking, which reflect the Company or, as appropriate, the Company directors current expectations and projections about future events. By their nature, forward-looking statements involve a number of risks, uncertainties and assumptions that could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. These risks, uncertainties and assumptions could adversely affect the outcome and financial effects of the plans and events described herein. A multitude of factors including, but not limited to, changes in demand, competition and technology, can cause actual events, performance or results to differ significantly from any anticipated development. Forward looking statements contained in this press release regarding past trends or activities should not be taken as a representation that such trends or activities will continue in the future. As a result, the Company expressly disclaims any obligation or undertaking to release any update or revisions to any forward-looking statements in this press release as a result of any change in expectations or any change in events, conditions, assumptions or circumstances on which these forward-looking statements are based. Neither the Company nor its advisers or representatives nor any of its subsidiary undertakings or any such persons officers or employees guarantees that the assumptions underlying such forward-looking statements are free from errors nor does either accept any responsibility for the future accuracy of the forward-looking statements contained in this press release or the actual occurrence of the forecasted developments. You should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this press release.

Read more from the original source:
Bone Therapeutics, Link Health and Pregene to develop and commercialize the ALLOB allogeneic bone cell therapy platform in China and Southeast Asia -...

NMDP/Be The Match partners with M Health Fairview and Duke University cryopreservation labs to launch Be The Match BioBank – PRNewswire

MINNEAPOLIS, Oct. 6, 2020 /PRNewswire/ --The National Marrow Donor Program (NMDP)/Be The Match today announced a collaboration with the Minnesota health system M Health Fairview and Marcus Center for Cellular Cures (MC3)/Carolinas Cord Blood Bank at Duke University (Duke) to offer cryopreservation services to transplant centers through the Be The Match BioBank. The collaboration brings together industry-leading expertise in cryopreservation and storage of patient-directed donor blood stem cell products to improve donor availability, collection quality, and ultimately, to provide a more reliable path to transplant for patients.

Through the Be The Match BioBank, blood stem cell donors will be able to donate bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) for an intended patient on a timeline that is convenient for the donor. The cells are then cryopreserved and stored for the transplant center at no cost to them and shipped to coincide with initiation of the patient's conditioning regimen and optimal treatment timeline.

"We're excited to expand our partnership with Duke University by adding the expertise of physicians and researchers at M Health Fairview University of Minnesota Medical Center to continue to overcome logistical barriers to blood and marrow transplantation that might otherwise disrupt optimal patient care. Through the flexibility offered by the Be The Match BioBank, we believe we can provide transplant centers with a well-matched, available donor more often, and allow the transplant to occur at the best time for the patient," explained Steven Devine, MD, Chief Medical Officer, NMDP/Be The Match, and Associate Scientific Director, CIBMTR (Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research). "The team at the Duke University lab was instrumental in the development of the Be The Match BioBank, as well as supporting donor product cryopreservation during the COVID-19 pandemic to ensure patients can continue to receive the transplants they need."

"We are proud to extend our partnership with the NMDP/Be The Match in a new way. Be The Match BioBank is an innovative way to remove barriers that otherwise may stand in the way of a patient's transplant," said Joanne Kurtzberg, MD, who leads the Marcus Center for Cellular Cures (MC3)/Carolinas Cord Blood Bank at Duke University.

"We are thrilled to be working with the NMDP/Be The Match to offer Be The Match BioBank. Through this partnership, transplant physicians can have confidence a high-quality bone marrow or PBSC product will be available from the donor they requested in the timeframe that works best for their patient," said David McKenna, MD, who leads the Molecular and Cellular Therapeutics program at M Health Fairview.

Be The Match BioBank can be used by any transplant center in the NMDP/Be The Match Network of more than 180 transplant centers worldwide. Blood stem cell donors are informed that the transplant center is requesting cryopreservation and provide consent prior to collection. Donors can also consent to having their donated cells made available to other searching patients in the unlikely event the intended patient is unable to proceed to transplant as planned.

To learn more about Be The Match BioBank, visit Network.BeTheMatchClinical.org/BioBank.

About the National Marrow Donor Program/Be The Match The National Marrow Donor Program/Be The Match is the global leader in providing a cure to patients with life-threatening blood and marrow cancers like leukemia and lymphoma, as well as other diseases. The organization manages the world's largest registry of potential blood stem cell donors and cord blood units. The NMDP/Be The Match partners with a global network to connect patients to their donor match for a transplant, and provides education and support for patients. Through Be The Match BioTherapies, the NMDP/Be The Match partners with cell and gene therapy companies to support the development and delivery of new therapies. The organization conducts research through its research program, CIBMTR (Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research), in collaboration with Medical College of Wisconsin.

About M Health Fairview M Health Fairview is the newly expanded collaboration betweenthe University of Minnesota, University of Minnesota Physicians,and Fairview Health Services. The healthcare system combines the best of academic and community medicine expanding access to world-class, breakthrough care through its 10 hospitals and 60 clinics.

SOURCE Be The Match

Read more from the original source:
NMDP/Be The Match partners with M Health Fairview and Duke University cryopreservation labs to launch Be The Match BioBank - PRNewswire

Neural Stem Cells Market size and Key Trends in terms of volume and value 2020- – News by aeresearch

Global Neural Stem Cells Market research report provides and in-depth analysis on industry and economy-wide database for business management that could potentially offer development and profitability for players in this market. The Neural Stem Cells market report discusses all major market aspects with expert opinion on current market status along with historic data. This market report is a detailed study on the investment opportunities, market statistics, growing competition analysis, major key players, industry facts, important figures, sales, prices, revenues, gross margins, market shares, business strategies, regions, demand and developments.

The Neural Stem Cells market report contains a holistic analysis of this business domain, with respect to the key growth drivers, opportunities, and restraints. The document scrutinizes the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the growth matrix of this vertical. Moreover, it provides crucial information regarding the competitive landscape and assesses popular tactics employed by leading participants in order to adapt to the market instabilities.

Major highlights from COVID-19 impact analysis:

Request Sample Copy of this Report @ https://www.aeresearch.net/request-sample/320130

An overview of the regional analysis:

Additional highlights from the Neural Stem Cells market report:

Key Questions Answered:

Request Customization on This Report @ https://www.aeresearch.net/request-for-customization/320130

Read more here:
Neural Stem Cells Market size and Key Trends in terms of volume and value 2020- - News by aeresearch

Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Market Set to Witness an Uptick during 2020 2026 – The Daily Chronicle

The Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Market study offers a whole investigation of the Industry that contains authenticities, experiences, authentic information, and factually upheld and industry-approved market data. Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Market report conjointly contains estimates that are gotten from reliable sources and practices.

Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Industry Segmentation

The whole Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool market has been sub-sorted by segments and subsegments. The report offers an examination of those subsections concerning the provincial division. This market research report can keep marketers refined and assist them in making informed business decisions and gain a competitive edge in the market over their competitors.

The Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool market can be segmented:

By Companies: Osiris Therapeutics, Inc., Cytori Therapeutics, Inc., Astellas Pharma Inc., Caladrius Biosciences, Inc., Cellular Engineering Technologies Inc., U.S. Stem Cell, Inc., BioTime Inc., TEMCELL Technologies Inc., BrainStorm Cell Therapeutics Inc.

By Types: Services, Software, Instruments, Accessories, Consumables, Reagent and Assay Kits

By Application: Neurological Disorders, Orthopedic Treatments, Oncology Disorders, Diabetes, Other Therapeutic Applications, Drug Development and Discovery Embryonic Stem Cells Research

Get Instant Sample [emailprotected] https://www.regalintelligence.com/request-sample/170873

This Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool market report is submitted the far-reaching utilization of both primary and secondary information sources. The market research report incorporates the investigation of numerous components that are impacting the business, along with the govt strategy, current situation and market condition, patterns inside the market, future innovations, and specialized advancement in associated ventures, and market opportunities, market obstructions, and difficulties.

With figures and tables, the report studies the Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Industry. This investigation conveys key measurements on the condition of the market and could be an important information source for creators and individuals inquisitive about this market. The report conjointly offers late market elements, such as driving factors, limiting elements, and market news, for example, mergers, ventures, and acquisitions. It offers market size (volume and worth), market income, development rate, and incorporates each quantitative and subjective methodologies to make assessments in various districts or nations.

The report on Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool market will help in understanding the business to construct ways for business development in a likely manner. Inside the report, it furthermore offers bits of knowledge from advancing channel to potential development methodologies, giving top to bottom investigation of dominating players in the Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool market.

Enquire about this [emailprotected] https://www.regalintelligence.com/enquiry/170873

1 Report Overview 1.1 Study Scope and Definition 1.2 Research Methodology 1.2.1 Methodology/Research Approach 1.2.2 Data Source 1.3 Key Market Segments 1.4 Players Covered: Ranking by Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Revenue 1.5 Market Analysis by Type 1.5.1 Global Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Market Size Growth Rate by Type: 2020 VS 2026 1.5.2 Services 1.5.3 Software 1.5.4 Instruments 1.5.5 Accessories 1.5.6 Consumables 1.5.7 Reagent and Assay Kits 1.6 Market by Application 1.6.1 Global Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Market Share by Application: 2021-2026 1.6.2 Neurological Disorders 1.6.3 Orthopedic Treatments 1.6.4 Oncology Disorders 1.6.5 Diabetes 1.6.6 Other Therapeutic Applications 1.6.7 Drug Development and Discovery Embryonic Stem Cells Research 1.7 Coronavirus Disease 2019 (Covid-19) Impact Will Have a Severe Impact on Global Growth 1.7.1 Covid-19 Impact: Global GDP Growth, 2019, 2020 and 2021 Projections 1.7.2 Covid-19 Impact: Commodity Prices Indices 1.7.3 Covid-19 Impact: Global Major Government Policy 1.8 Study Objectives 1.9 Years Considered 2 Global Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Market Trends and Growth Strategy 2.1 Market Top Trends 2.2 Market Drivers 2.3 Market Challenges 2.4 Porters Five Forces Analysis 2.5 Market Growth Strategy 2.6 SWOT Analysis 3 Global Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Market Players Profiles 3.1 Osiris Therapeutics, Inc. 3.1.1 Osiris Therapeutics, Inc. Company Profile 3.1.2 Osiris Therapeutics, Inc. Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Product Specification 3.1.3 Osiris Therapeutics, Inc. Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Production Capacity, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015-2020) 3.2 Cytori Therapeutics, Inc. 3.2.1 Cytori Therapeutics, Inc. Company Profile 3.2.2 Cytori Therapeutics, Inc. Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Product Specification 3.2.3 Cytori Therapeutics, Inc. Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Production Capacity, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015-2020) 3.3 Astellas Pharma Inc. 3.3.1 Astellas Pharma Inc. Company Profile 3.3.2 Astellas Pharma Inc. Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Product Specification 3.3.3 Astellas Pharma Inc. Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Production Capacity, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015-2020) 3.4 Caladrius Biosciences, Inc. 3.4.1 Caladrius Biosciences, Inc. Company Profile 3.4.2 Caladrius Biosciences, Inc. Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Product Specification 3.4.3 Caladrius Biosciences, Inc. Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Production Capacity, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015-2020) 3.5 Cellular Engineering Technologies Inc. 3.5.1 Cellular Engineering Technologies Inc. Company Profile 3.5.2 Cellular Engineering Technologies Inc. Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Product Specification 3.5.3 Cellular Engineering Technologies Inc. Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Production Capacity, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015-2020) 3.6 U.S. Stem Cell, Inc. 3.6.1 U.S. Stem Cell, Inc. Company Profile 3.6.2 U.S. Stem Cell, Inc. Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Product Specification 3.6.3 U.S. Stem Cell, Inc. Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Production Capacity, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015-2020) 3.7 BioTime Inc. 3.7.1 BioTime Inc. Company Profile 3.7.2 BioTime Inc. Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Product Specification 3.7.3 BioTime Inc. Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Production Capacity, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015-2020) 3.8 TEMCELL Technologies Inc. 3.8.1 TEMCELL Technologies Inc. Company Profile 3.8.2 TEMCELL Technologies Inc. Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Product Specification 3.8.3 TEMCELL Technologies Inc. Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Production Capacity, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015-2020) 3.9 BrainStorm Cell Therapeutics Inc. 3.9.1 BrainStorm Cell Therapeutics Inc. Company Profile 3.9.2 BrainStorm Cell Therapeutics Inc. Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Product Specification 3.9.3 BrainStorm Cell Therapeutics Inc. Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Production Capacity, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015-2020) 4 Global Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Market Competition by Market Players 4.1 Global Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Production Capacity Market Share by Market Players (2015-2020) 4.2 Global Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Revenue Market Share by Market Players (2015-2020) 4.3 Global Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Average Price by Market Players (2015-2020) 5 Global Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Production by Regions (2015-2020) 5.1 North America 5.1.1 North America Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Market Size (2015-2020) 5.1.2 Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Key Players in North America (2015-2020) 5.1.3 North America Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Market Size by Type (2015-2020) 5.1.4 North America Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Market Size by Application (2015-2020) 5.2 East Asia 5.2.1 East Asia Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Market Size (2015-2020) 5.2.2 Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Key Players in East Asia (2015-2020) 5.2.3 East Asia Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Market Size by Type (2015-2020) 5.2.4 East Asia Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Market Size by Application (2015-2020) 5.3 Europe 5.3.1 Europe Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Market Size (2015-2020) 5.3.2 Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Key Players in Europe (2015-2020) 5.3.3 Europe Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Market Size by Type (2015-2020) 5.3.4 Europe Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Market Size by Application (2015-2020) 5.4 South Asia 5.4.1 South Asia Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Market Size (2015-2020) 5.4.2 Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Key Players in South Asia (2015-2020) 5.4.3 South Asia Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Market Size by Type (2015-2020) 5.4.4 South Asia Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Market Size by Application (2015-2020) 5.5 Southeast Asia 5.5.1 Southeast Asia Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Market Size (2015-2020) 5.5.2 Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Key Players in Southeast Asia (2015-2020) 5.5.3 Southeast Asia Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Market Size by Type (2015-2020) 5.5.4 Southeast Asia Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Market Size by Application (2015-2020) 5.6 Middle East 5.6.1 Middle East Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Market Size (2015-2020) 5.6.2 Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Key Players in Middle East (2015-2020) 5.6.3 Middle East Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Market Size by Type (2015-2020) 5.6.4 Middle East Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Market Size by Application (2015-2020) 5.7 Africa 5.7.1 Africa Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Market Size (2015-2020) 5.7.2 Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Key Players in Africa (2015-2020) 5.7.3 Africa Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Market Size by Type (2015-2020) 5.7.4 Africa Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Market Size by Application (2015-2020) 5.8 Oceania 5.8.1 Oceania Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Market Size (2015-2020) 5.8.2 Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Key Players in Oceania (2015-2020) 5.8.3 Oceania Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Market Size by Type (2015-2020) 5.8.4 Oceania Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Market Size by Application (2015-2020) 5.9 South America 5.9.1 South America Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Market Size (2015-2020) 5.9.2 Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Key Players in South America (2015-2020) 5.9.3 South America Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Market Size by Type (2015-2020) 5.9.4 South America Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Market Size by Application (2015-2020) 5.10 Rest of the World 5.10.1 Rest of the World Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Market Size (2015-2020) 5.10.2 Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Key Players in Rest of the World (2015-2020) 5.10.3 Rest of the World Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Market Size by Type (2015-2020) 5.10.4 Rest of the World Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Market Size by Application (2015-2020) 6 Global Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Consumption by Region (2015-2020) 6.1 North America 6.1.1 North America Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Consumption by Countries 6.1.2 United States 6.1.3 Canada 6.1.4 Mexico 6.2 East Asia 6.2.1 East Asia Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Consumption by Countries 6.2.2 China 6.2.3 Japan 6.2.4 South Korea 6.3 Europe 6.3.1 Europe Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Consumption by Countries 6.3.2 Germany 6.3.3 United Kingdom 6.3.4 France 6.3.5 Italy 6.3.6 Russia 6.3.7 Spain 6.3.8 Netherlands 6.3.9 Switzerland 6.3.10 Poland 6.4 South Asia 6.4.1 South Asia Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Consumption by Countries 6.4.2 India 6.5 Southeast Asia 6.5.1 Southeast Asia Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Consumption by Countries 6.5.2 Indonesia 6.5.3 Thailand 6.5.4 Singapore 6.5.5 Malaysia 6.5.6 Philippines 6.6 Middle East 6.6.1 Middle East Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Consumption by Countries 6.6.2 Turkey 6.6.3 Saudi Arabia 6.6.4 Iran 6.6.5 United Arab Emirates 6.7 Africa 6.7.1 Africa Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Consumption by Countries 6.7.2 Nigeria 6.7.3 South Africa 6.8 Oceania 6.8.1 Oceania Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Consumption by Countries 6.8.2 Australia 6.9 South America 6.9.1 South America Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Consumption by Countries 6.9.2 Brazil 6.9.3 Argentina 6.10 Rest of the World 6.10.1 Rest of the World Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Consumption by Countries 7 Global Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Production Forecast by Regions (2021-2026) 7.1 Global Forecasted Production of Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool (2021-2026) 7.2 Global Forecasted Revenue of Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool (2021-2026) 7.3 Global Forecasted Price of Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool (2021-2026) 7.4 Global Forecasted Production of Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool by Region (2021-2026) 7.4.1 North America Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Production, Revenue Forecast (2021-2026) 7.4.2 East Asia Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Production, Revenue Forecast (2021-2026) 7.4.3 Europe Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Production, Revenue Forecast (2021-2026) 7.4.4 South Asia Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Production, Revenue Forecast (2021-2026) 7.4.5 Southeast Asia Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Production, Revenue Forecast (2021-2026) 7.4.6 Middle East Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Production, Revenue Forecast (2021-2026) 7.4.7 Africa Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Production, Revenue Forecast (2021-2026) 7.4.8 Oceania Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Production, Revenue Forecast (2021-2026) 7.4.9 South America Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Production, Revenue Forecast (2021-2026) 7.4.10 Rest of the World Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Production, Revenue Forecast (2021-2026) 7.5 Forecast by Type and by Application (2021-2026) 7.5.1 Global Sales Volume, Sales Revenue and Sales Price Forecast by Type (2021-2026) 7.5.2 Global Forecasted Consumption of Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool by Application (2021-2026) 8 Global Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Consumption Forecast by Regions (2021-2026) 8.1 North America Forecasted Consumption of Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool by Country 8.2 East Asia Market Forecasted Consumption of Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool by Country 8.3 Europe Market Forecasted Consumption of Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool by Countriy 8.4 South Asia Forecasted Consumption of Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool by Country 8.5 Southeast Asia Forecasted Consumption of Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool by Country 8.6 Middle East Forecasted Consumption of Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool by Country 8.7 Africa Forecasted Consumption of Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool by Country 8.8 Oceania Forecasted Consumption of Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool by Country 8.9 South America Forecasted Consumption of Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool by Country 8.10 Rest of the world Forecasted Consumption of Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool by Country 9 Global Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Sales by Type (2015-2026) 9.1 Global Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Historic Market Size by Type (2015-2020) 9.2 Global Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Forecasted Market Size by Type (2021-2026) 10 Global Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Consumption by Application (2015-2026) 10.1 Global Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Historic Market Size by Application (2015-2020) 10.2 Global Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Forecasted Market Size by Application (2021-2026) 11 Global Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Manufacturing Cost Analysis 11.1 Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Key Raw Materials Analysis 11.1.1 Key Raw Materials 11.2 Proportion of Manufacturing Cost Structure 11.3 Manufacturing Process Analysis of Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool 12 Global Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Marketing Channel, Distributors, Customers and Supply Chain 12.1 Marketing Channel 12.2 Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Distributors List 12.3 Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Customers 12.4 Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Supply Chain Analysis 13 Analyst's Viewpoints/Conclusions 14 Disclaimer

Get Detailed Table of Contents: https://www.regalintelligence.com/request-toc/170873

The report contains Porters 5 Forces Model, Value Chain Analysis, and Market Pull Analysis. These devices encourage to get a straightforward picture of the business structure and evaluate the market quality at a global level. Moreover, these apparatuses conjointly present a total investigation of product application inside the worldwide Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Industry.

Here is the original post:
Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tool Market Set to Witness an Uptick during 2020 2026 - The Daily Chronicle

Oncology Market Size 2020 Particularly Prone To Disruption During Pandemic In The Global Oncology Market – GlobeNewswire

October 06, 2020 06:00 ET | Source: The Business Research Company

LONDON, Oct. 06, 2020 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- (Oncology Drugs Companies Included: F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG, Novartis AG, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Merck & Co., Inc., Johnson & Johnson)

The global oncology/cancer drugs market size reached a value of nearly $167.9 billion in 2019, having increased at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 9.8% since 2015. The oncology market size 2020 is expected to decline from $167.9 billion in 2019 to $149.9 billion in 2020 at a rate of -11%. The decline is mainly due to lockdown and social distancing norms imposed by various countries and economic slowdown across countries owing to the COVID-19 outbreak and the measures to contain it. The market is then expected to grow slightly from $201.1 billion in 2021 to $284.5 billion in 2023 at a CAGR of 9.7%. North America has the largest cancer drug market share, accounting for 41.2% of the total market.

The Business Research Companys report titled Oncology Drugs Market - Opportunities And Strategies - Global Forecast To 2030 covers major oncology drugs companies, oncology drugs market share by company, oncology drugs manufacturers, oncology drugs infrastructure market size, and oncology drugs market forecasts. The report also covers the global oncology drugs market and its segments. The cancer market by type is segmented into drugs for lung cancer, pancreatic cancer, breast cancer, prostate cancer, ovarian cancer, colorectal cancer, gastric cancer, kidney cancer, brain tumor, thyroid cancer, skin cancer, bladder cancer, cervical cancer, blood cancer and others, by drug class type into targeted therapy, immunotherapy (biologic therapy), chemotherapy and hormonal therapy, by distribution channel into hospital pharmacies, retail pharmacies/drug stores and others, by route of administration into oral, parental and others, by drug classification into branded drugs and generic drugs.

Request For A Sample Of The Global Oncology Drugs Market Report:

https://www.thebusinessresearchcompany.com/sample.aspx?id=3440&type=smp

Companies in the oncology drugs market are increasing their product innovation through strategic collaborations. To sustain in the increasingly competitive market, organizations are developing innovative products as well as sharing skills and expertise with other such enterprises. While oncology drug companies have long collaborated with each other as well as with academic and research institutions in this market by way of partnerships, in or out licensing deals, this trend has been increasing over the recent years.

New technologies are being implemented in the cancer drug market, such as artificial intelligence in the research and development process, as well as 3D printing devices to mimic the human body for trials and testing of the drugs developed. Companies are also investing in technologies to develop next generation biologics such as antibody drug conjugates, bispecifics, fusion proteins, cell and gene therapy that will be more effective as they are expected to have better potency against the target disease as well as have the ability to treat more than one aspect of the disease. Over the last few years, there has been a significant rise in accelerated approval of cell and gene therapies for cancer treatment by regulatory bodies across the globe. CRISPR technology can be used to discover the non-coding cancer genome. CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing reduces the processing associated with the generation of cell line and animal models of cancer and complex generations. Thus, it generates a better cancer model for target validation and drug evaluation. CRISPRCas9 is accelerating the different stages of oncology drug discovery including target identification, validation and deconvolution, drug synthesis, assessment of drug sensitivity and resistance.

With innovation through technology and rising focus on development of new drugs, the oncology drugs market trends ought to bring advances in cancer therapies in the forecasted period.

Oncology Drugs Market - Opportunities And Strategies - Global Forecast To 2030 is one of a series of new reports from The Business Research Company that provide oncology drugs market overviews, oncology drugs market analyze and forecast oncology drugs market size and growth for the whole market, oncology drugs market segments and oncology drugs market geographies, oncology drugs market trends, oncology drugs market drivers, oncology drugs market restraints, oncology drugs market leading competitors revenues, profiles and market shares in over 1,000 industry reports, covering over 2,500 market segments and 60 geographies.

The report also gives in-depth analysis of the impact of COVID-19 on the market. The reports draw on 150,000 datasets, extensive secondary research, and exclusive insights from interviews with industry leaders. A highly experienced and expert team of analysts and modelers provides market analysis and forecasts. The reports identify top countries and segments for opportunities and strategies based on market trends and leading competitors approaches.

Here Is A List Of Similar Reports By The Business Research Company:

Clinical Oncology Next Generation Sequencing Global Market Report 2020-30: COVID 19 Growth and Change

Interventional Oncology Devices Global Market Report 2020-30: COVID 19 Growth and Change

Cancer Diagnostics Global Market Report 2020-30: COVID 19 Growth And Change

Interested to know more about The Business Research Company?

The Business Research Company is a market intelligence firm that excels in company, market, and consumer research. Located globally it has specialist consultants in a wide range of industries including manufacturing, healthcare, financial services, chemicals, and technology.

The Worlds Most Comprehensive Database

The Business Research Companys flagship product, Global Market Model, is a market intelligence platform covering various macroeconomic indicators and metrics across 60 geographies and 27 industries. The Global Market Model covers multi-layered datasets which help its users assess supply-demand gaps.

Link:
Oncology Market Size 2020 Particularly Prone To Disruption During Pandemic In The Global Oncology Market - GlobeNewswire

Cutting off H-1B visas will hurt the biopharma industry – STAT – STAT

Ive traveled the world because of science.

My undergraduate and doctoral studies were in Boston. Ive done stem cell research in Singapore. I worked in Belgium to learn about camelid antibodies, studied chemistry in England, and given talks around the world.

This type of freedom to study and work across countries made it possible for me to learn from the best, expanded my scientific horizons, and instilled in me a deep passion to make the world a better place. These experiences also empowered me with the skills and conviction needed to enter the biopharma world and start Olaris, a precision medicine company that identifies biomarkers of response to optimize outcomes and improve health.

advertisement

Proposals by the federal government to make it difficult for people of other countries to have these experiences here in the U.S. will, I believe, hurt the biopharmaceutical industry.

In June, Presidential Proclamation 10051 suspended immigration into the United States for anyone holding H-1B, J-1, and L visas, and suspended granting new ones. Most worrisome for the pharmaceutical industry is the ban on H-1B visas, because it will limit, and in some instances entirely prevent, biopharma companies from recruiting the specialized talent they need.

advertisement

According to the proclamation, the suspension and limitation are aimed at ensuring that the presence in the United States of H-1B nonimmigrants does not disadvantage United States workers. The proclamation ends on Dec. 31, at which point the limitations will cease or the administration may extend them as it sees fit.

In August, the president issued an executive order that prevents federal agencies from hiring employees that would displace American workers. This would require federal employers to prove that a new employee requiring an H-1B visa would not be replacing an American worker. Federal agencies like the National Institute of Health, the National Science Foundation, the Department of Defense, and the Food and Drug Administration have multiple million- to billion-dollar research budgets and typically employ hundreds of talented scientists, including U.S. citizens and, at least until now, many through H-1B sponsorship. Federal funded research is an essential part of the science and innovation ecosystem and in many ways acts as a feeder to biopharma for ideas, tools, and people. So, while this may not seem to directly hurt biopharma immediately, it will cut off important pipelines.

And in September, the Department of Homeland Security submitted to the Office of Management and Budget a new H-1B regulation for final review that further restricts the definition of specialty occupation and makes it more difficult for visa holders who work primarily outside of the main office. For biopharma companies this could have dual repercussions. It could limit staff being sent out to the field, such as hospitals, manufacturing sites, and the like. It could also limit the staffing of many of service providers, such as IT, maintenance, sanitation, and health and safety specialists who are engaged to work in biopharma facilities. This new regulation is designated as an interim final rule, meaning it will go into effect immediately without public input.

Science is global work, and the biopharma industry is a global business. Biopharma companies need to have the ability to hire the most qualified candidate for a particular job regardless of where that person was born and raised.

The biggest biopharma companies, such as Novartis, Sanofi, Pfizer, Amgen, and others, hire many talented workers via H-1B sponsorship to develop therapies. So do small companies like mine: Two of our 12 employees have H-1B visas.

A recent commentary on U.S. immigration policies in the journal Cell showed that immigrants were drivers to many breakthrough therapies such as Avastin, which helps individuals with molecular degeneration see better; Remicade, which makes it easier for rheumatoid arthritis patients to walk; CAR-T cell therapies that can bring long-term remission to many cancer patients; and more.

Even our hope for a Covid-19 vaccine can be tied to the work of immigrants: The founders of Moderna, one of the forerunners in vaccine development, include Derrick Rossi, a Canadian who originally came to Stanford for a postdoctoral fellowship on an H-1B visa, and Noubar Afeyan, who was an international Ph.D. student at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Even Stphane Bancel, Modernas CEO, was once an international student at Minnesota and at Harvard Business School.

If we want more innovation and we need it we cant limit the talent pool.

Covid-19 has killed more than 200,000 people in the U.S alone, put millions of Americans out of work, and is crushing local economies. I understand the desire to boost employment for Americans. Yet the logic that limiting H-1B visas will let more American citizens get jobs doesnt make sense for biopharma companies because there arent enough Americans trained at the highest levels of science to fill the existing job openings.

American universities are training the best and the brightest in the sciences, and the majority of those trainees are foreigners. The National Foundation for American Policy reported in 2017 that 79% of students in computer science, 57% in chemical engineering, and 56% in pharmaceutical sciences at U.S. institutions were international students. If our federal government wants citizens to be more competitive for todays biopharma jobs, it must do more to improve science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education and encourage more youths to pursue it.

Many international students who train in the U.S. want to stay here, rent or buy homes, dine at restaurants, shop at local stores, participate in our economy, become active members of the community, and even pay taxes, all while contributing to scientific discoveries with the potential to transform society or at least they used to. If visas become limited and they cant find jobs, they will seek biopharma jobs elsewhere.

If the U.S. continues on its current H-1B path, biopharma companies who cannot hire the workers they need will be faced with a few choices: Establish new hubs abroad or move main offices to other countries, outsource the work when possible to service providers in other countries, or decide against pursuing the work altogether. None of these choices seem nearly as good for the companies, or the U.S. economy, as bringing on additional full-time workers. Denying H-1B visas is bad economics and bad for science.

The biopharma industry is an essential part of the U.S economy and a key player in addressing the Covid-19 crisis. We need representatives who will craft legislation that will bolster, not hinder, biopharmas efforts. More than ever we need the best science done by the best scientists, and that knows no boundaries.

Elizabeth ODay is the founder and CEO of Massachusetts-based Olaris. This essay was adapted from a longer version that was originally published on the Olaris website.

Trending

Race for Covid-19 vaccine slows as regulators, top Warp

Race for Covid-19 vaccine slows as regulators, top Warp Speed official tap the brakes

As AstraZenecas Covid-19 vaccine trial remains on hold in

As AstraZenecas Covid-19 vaccine trial remains on hold in U.S., participants waiting on a second dose

CDC: 80,000 people died of flu last winter in

CDC: 80,000 people died of flu last winter in U.S., highest death toll in 40 years

Recommended

Is it cant hurt the rationale for giving Trump

Is it cant hurt the rationale for giving Trump unproven Covid-19 treatments?

Access to medical oxygen: a glaring global inequity

Access to medical oxygen: a glaring global inequity

The irony of the day: Covid-19 at the White

The irony of the day: Covid-19 at the White House is a simple matter of workplace

Read the original post:
Cutting off H-1B visas will hurt the biopharma industry - STAT - STAT

Reven Strengthens Its Clinical Team With Three New Members – BioSpace

Oct. 5, 2020 11:30 UTC

GOLDEN, Colo.--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- Reven Holdings, Inc. (Reven) is a privately held clinical stage biotechnology and pharmaceutical company dedicated to the discovery and development of novel treatment platforms for cancer, viral illnessesincluding COVID-19and inflammatory disorders.

Reven is planning to initiate a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-institutional clinical trial of its lead anti-inflammatory/anti-oxidant investigational drug product Rejuveinix (RJX) in the treatment of COVID-19. The upcoming clinical trial is designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of RJX in COVID-19 patients.

Reven today announced that three new members with extensive experience and knowledge in clinical research and quality assurance have joined its multi-disciplinary team to work on the COVID-19 clinical project:

Nancy Oehlke has assumed the role of Manager of Regulatory Affairs and Quality Assurance. Nancy has 20+ years of experience in drug development, Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) / Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) compliance, regulatory aspects of drug product manufacturing and testing, and clinical research.

Renae Townsend has assumed the role of Director of Clinical Operations and Jenny Daniels has assumed the role of Director of Clinical Quality Assurance. Both Renae and Jenny have 15+ years of Good Clinical Practice (GCP), clinical research and clinical monitoring experience.

These new team members will help us provide sponsor oversight for the services rendered by the clinical research organizations (CRO) and other vendors who will support our clinical RJX program and execution of the clinical trial. I am excited to welcome these very experienced new members to Reven. I look forward to the opportunity to work side by side with them as we try to diligently advance the clinical development of RJX, said Fatih Uckun, MD PhD, Chief Medical Officer and Chief Scientific Officer of Reven.

Our IND (Investigational New Drug) application package for COVID-19 is completed and we are planning to roll out our clinical program against COVID-19 in the coming month, said Michael Volk, Director and Chief Strategy Officer of Reven.

Our new team members each will have a very important role in our efforts aimed at evaluating the clinical impact potential of RJX, added Peter Lange, CEO of Reven.

About Rejuveinix (RJX) RJX is an intravenous (IV) formulation of a patented first-in-class pharmaceutical composition containing a specific mixture of anti-oxidant and anti-inflammatory ingredients that is being developed for more effective treatment of patients with inflammatory disorders, including COVID-19 patients with viral sepsis and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The clinical safety and tolerability of RJX was confirmed in a recently completed double blind, placebo-controlled Phase 1 dose-escalation study in healthy volunteers (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03680105).

About Reven Holdings, Inc. Reven Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation, through its Golden/Colorado-based operating company Reven, LLC, is developing new drugs for difficult-to-treat diseases. As a clinical stage biopharmaceutical company, Revens overarching goal is to develop effective treatments for serious health conditions caused by infectious, inflammatory, cardiovascular, and metabolic diseases. Its lead product, RJX, is being developed as a treatment platform against complications of COVID-19, sepsis, cardiovascular diseases, and diabetes.

About Dr. Fatih Uckun, M.D., Ph.D, Chief Medical Officer of Reven. Dr. Uckun is an Active Member of the American Society for Clinical Investigation (ASCI), an honor society for physician-scientists, and an active member of several professional organizations. He earned his doctoral degrees at University of Heidelberg in Germany and completed his residency training in Pediatrics, fellowship training in Hematology/Oncology/Blood and Bone Marrow Stem Cell Transplantation, as well as postdoctoral research training in immunology and microbiology at the University of Minnesota in the US.

Dr. Uckun has more than 30 years of professional experience in developmental therapeutics and biopharmaceuticals in oncology/immuno-oncology as well as infectious diseases and immunology. In addition, Dr. Uckun has deep knowledge and 20+ years of experience in treatment of infectious diseases and their complications. In particular, he has extensive experience in viral, fungal, and bacterial infections of immunocompromised hosts, septic shock, ARDS as well as systemic capillary leak syndrome and cytokine release syndrome (CRS). Dr. Uckun served as a Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA)-funded principal investigator and directed a universal virus neutralizer program project as part of a countermeasures initiative against viruses that can be used as bioweapons and therefore pose a biothreat for our national security. Prior to joining Reven, Dr. Uckun was a Vice President, Clinical Strategy Lead, Oncology-Hematology and Member of the COVID-19 Task Force at Worldwide Clinical Trials.

Dr. Uckun worked 11 years as a Professor of Bone Marrow Transplantation, Therapeutic Radiology-Radiation Oncology, Pharmacology, and Pediatrics as well as Director of the Biotherapy Institute at the University of Minnesota, where he became the first recipient of the Endowed Hughes Chair in Biotherapy. He worked 6 years as a Professor and Head of Translational Research in Leukemia and Lymphoma of the CCBD and a Principal Investigator of the Stem Cell-Regenerative Medicine Initiative at the at the University of Southern California. During that time, Dr. Uckun served as the Chair of the Biotargeting Working Group for the National Cancer Institute (NCI)s Nanotechnology Alliance in Cancer.

He has held executive positions in multiple biotechnology companies and has extensive regulatory experience. He has published more than 500 peer-reviewed papers, received numerous awards, and served as a member of several medical journal editorial boards and NIH grant review/special emphasis panels. Website: https://www.linkedin.com/in/fatihuckun/

Revens Cautionary Note on Forward-Looking Statements This press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements, other than statements of historical facts, included in this communication regarding strategy, future operations, future financial position, prospects, plans and objectives of management are forward-looking statements. Words such as may, on-track, expect, anticipate hope, vision, optimism, design, exciting, promising, will, conviction, estimate, intend, believe and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements contained in this press release include, but are not limited to, statements about future plans, the progress, timing, clinical development, scope and success of future clinical trials, the reporting of clinical data for the companys product candidates and the potential use of the companys product candidates to treat various disease indications. Each of these forward-looking statements involves risks and uncertainties, and actual results may differ materially from these forward-looking statements. Many factors may cause differences between current expectations and actual results, including unexpected safety or efficacy data observed during preclinical or clinical studies, clinical trial site activation or enrollment rates that are lower than expected, changes in expected or existing market competition, changes in the regulatory environment, failure of collaborators to support or advance collaborations or product candidates, and unexpected litigation or other disputes. These risks are not exhaustive; the company faces known and unknown risks, including the risk factors described in the companys periodic SEC filings. Forward-looking statements are based on expectations and assumptions as of the date of this press release. Except as required by law, the company does not assume any obligation to update forward-looking statements contained herein to reflect any change in expectations, whether as a result of new information regarding future events, or otherwise.

View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20201005005298/en/

Link:
Reven Strengthens Its Clinical Team With Three New Members - BioSpace