Category Archives: Gene Therapy Clinics

Fertilis medical advance uses automation to support cells – Healthcare Global – Healthcare News, Magazine and Website

An Australian medtech startup, Fertilis, has announced Horizons Ventures as its lead investor, following an AUS$2.75mn seed round.

Founded in 2019, Fertilis is headquartered in Adelaide, Australia and develops medical technology which transforms the IVF process by increasing IVF success rates. The company hopes that this technology will make the discovery of new treatments easier for a range of other chronic conditions, including cancer, diabetes and Cystic Fibrosis.

Infertility impacts one in seven couples in the USA and IVF has a success rate of 11% - 30%.

Despite being carried out by trained professionals, IVF is a complicated process, subject to external variables. Even human errors can have consequences for anxious patients, who must bear the financial and emotional toll.

With Fertilis automation technology, some of these variables are removed, which can improve pregnancy rates.

The Fertilis technology includes a new class of 3D printed micro-medical device (0.01 to 1.0 mm across, the width of a human hair) which can hold a single cell through to a small group of cells. This allows for the culturing of cells - such as an embryo - in micro environments, that resemble the conditions in the human body. Via monitoring and automation, the cells environment can be altered in a controlled manner, by removing the need for specialists to move the cells several times throughout the process.

Fertilis' technology reduces the number of cycles required to get pregnant, by 30-40%. Women usually need three cycles of IVF in order to become pregnant, but Fertilis' technology can reduce this to two.

The funding will permit the Fertilis team to expand its scientific development and in 2022, it will enter global IVF clinical trials, to market the application of cell culture automation.

Fertilis hopes to enter the IVF market in 2023 and then enter other parts of the healthcare sector, including gene therapy.

Due to its ability to significantly increase the accuracy and productivity of cell culture laboratory processes, we believe Fertilis' technology will have a transformative impact on a wide range of healthcare applications that ranges from diagnostics and treatment to the creation of specific cell culture products, said Chris Liu, Horizons Ventures. We look forward to working closely with Fertilis as the company begins clinical trials next year and scales internationally thereafter.

IVF can be an incredibly difficult and stressful experience, fraught with anxiety and uncertainty, said Professor Jeremy Thompson, Founder, CSO and Lead Researcher. Every failed attempt is devastating for aspiring parents and its heartbreaking for them to know that an IVF cycle is still more likely to fail than succeed. IVF is a fragile and complicated process with many variables; things like handling and transferring embryos from dish to dish, even the air quality in a lab can affect the result. Our technology allows for much greater precision and consistency, meaning we can offer women and couples with fertility issues a better chance of getting pregnant and having a healthy baby.

We believe our technology represents the most significant development in cell culture precision and consistency in over 30 years, said Marty Gauvin, Co-Founder and CEO. Starting with IVF, we will work with clinics and labs to build solutions that occupy the same space as their incubators do today. We are partnering with IVF facilities around the world to conduct full scale clinical trials; a crucial step in making this medical breakthrough available to couples and individuals dealing with infertility. For the clinics themselves we believe our offering is compelling; our technology is easy to adopt, its more reliable and transparent, giving lab technicians better control. This unique enabling technology is the future of IVF treatment and cell culture."

More:
Fertilis medical advance uses automation to support cells - Healthcare Global - Healthcare News, Magazine and Website

Biological Safety Testing Market to Witness Growth Acceleration | Sigma-Aldrich Corporation (US), Avance Biosciences, Inc. (US) Industrial IT -…

A2Z Market Research released the comprehensive research on Biological Safety Testing Market. The market is predictable to grow at a significant pace in the coming years. Biological Safety Testing Market 2021 research report presents analysis of market size, share, growth, trends, investments, cost structure, statistical and comprehensive data of the global market.

Get Sample Copy of this report with latest Industry Trend and COVID-19 Impact:

Top Key Vendors of this Market are:

Sigma-Aldrich Corporation (U.S.), Avance Biosciences, Inc. (U.S.), Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (U.S.), Merck & Co., Inc. (U.S.), Toxikon Corporation (U.S.), Lonza Group (Switzerland), SGS SA (Switzerland), WuXi PharmaTech (Cayman), Cytovance Biologics, Inc. (U.S.), BSL Bioservice (Germany).

As analytics have become an inherent part of every business activity and role, form a central role in the decision-making process of companies these days is mentioned in this report. In the next few years, the demand for the market is expected to substantially rise globally, enabling healthy growth of the Biological Safety Testing Market is also detailed in the report. This report highlights the manufacturing cost structure includes the cost of the materials, labor cost, depreciation cost, and the cost of manufacturing procedures. Price analysis and analysis of equipment suppliers are also done by the analysts in the report.

Depending on the important parameters this report elucidates a detailed outline of Biological Safety Testing market. For better understanding end users, products, regions and many other segments are studied and explained by the analyst. An impacting such as the driving forces which help make the market progressing are discussed in order to help the client understand the future market position.

Also, regional data of the key geographic segments with respect to Biological Safety Testing market is explained in detail for the readers. This gives an idea about which region is leading in this particular market helping make a better future investment plan. Further, the upcoming challenges, ongoing trends, strengths, and weaknesses are meticulously researched and discussed.

Global Biological Safety Testing Market Segmentation:

Market Segmentation: By Type

Adventitious Agents Detection Test, Bioburden Testing, Cell Line Authentication And Characterization Tests, Endotoxin Tests, Residual Host Contaminant Detection Tests, Sterility Testing, Other Tests

Market Segmentation: By Application

Blood & Blood Products, Cellular & Gene Therapy Products, Stem Cell Products, Tissues & Tissue Products, Vaccines and Therapeutics

Get Special Pricing on this Premium Report:

Biological Safety Testing systems help in maintaining updated information of patients, cut down healthcare costs, and enhance efficiency and accuracy. Owing to these benefits, they are being increasingly acknowledged by many physicians around the globe. Moreover, favorable initiatives introduced by several governments worldwide are promoting the adoption of Biological Safety Testing systems for healthcare facilities. The emergence of digital and connected healthcare technologies is also providing a significant push to the market.

The key regional markets methodically examined in the research report are North America, Europe, Japan, China, India, and Southeast Asia. North America is expected to represent a substantial share in the market during the forecast period. The growth of the region is primarily driven by the healthcare IT market in the U.S., which is one of the most prominent and mature markets worldwide. The stringent regulatory norms and Biological Safety Testing incentivizing policies in the region are prompting hospitals and clinics in the region to implement Biological Safety Testing solutions.

The global Biological Safety Testing Market Report covers:

Buy Exclusive Report:

If you have any special requirements, please let us know and we will offer you the report as you want.

About A2Z Market Research:

The A2Z Market Research library provides syndication reports from market researchers around the world. Ready-to-buy syndication Market research studies will help you find the most relevant business intelligence.

Our Research Analyst Provides business insights and market research reports for large and small businesses.

The company helps clients build business policies and grow in that market area. A2Z Market Research is not only interested in industry reports dealing with telecommunications, healthcare, pharmaceuticals, financial services, energy, technology, real estate, logistics, F & B, media, etc. but also your company data, country profiles, trends, information and analysis on the sector of your interest.

Contact Us:

Roger Smith

1887 WHITNEY MESA DR HENDERSON, NV 89014

+1 775 237 4147

Related Report:

See the original post:
Biological Safety Testing Market to Witness Growth Acceleration | Sigma-Aldrich Corporation (US), Avance Biosciences, Inc. (US) Industrial IT -...

FDA Approves First Cell-Based Gene Therapy for Adult …

For Immediate Release: March 27, 2021

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved Abecma (idecabtagene vicleucel), a cell-based gene therapy to treat adult patients with multiple myeloma who have not responded to, or whose disease has returned after, at least four prior lines (different types) of therapy. Abecma is the first cell-based gene therapy approved by the FDA for the treatment of multiple myeloma.

The FDA remains committed to advancing novel treatment options for areas of unmet patient need, said Peter Marks, M.D., Ph.D., director of the FDAs Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research. While there is no cure for multiple myeloma, the long-term outlook can vary based on the individuals age and the stage of the condition at the time of diagnosis. Todays approval provides a new treatment option for patients who have this uncommon type of cancer.

Multiple myeloma is an uncommon type of blood cancer in which abnormal plasma cells build up in the bone marrow and form tumors in many bones of the body. This disease keeps the bone marrow from making enough healthy blood cells, which can result in low blood counts. Myeloma can also damage the bones and the kidneys and weaken the immune system. The exact cause of multiple myeloma is unknown. According to the National Cancer Institute, myeloma accounted for approximately 1.8% (32,000) of all new cancer cases in the United States in 2020.

Abecma is a B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-directed genetically modified autologous chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy. Each dose of Abecma is a customized treatment created by using a patients own T-cells, which are a type of white blood cell, to help fight the myeloma. The patients T-cells are collected and genetically modified to include a new gene that facilitates targeting and killing myeloma cells. Once the cells are modified, they are infused back into the patient.

The safety and efficacy of Abecma were established in a multicenter study of 127 patients with relapsed myeloma (myeloma that returns after completion of treatment) and refractory myeloma (myeloma that does not respond to treatment), who received at least three prior antimyeloma lines of therapy. About 88% of patients in the study group had received four or more prior lines of antimyeloma therapy. Overall, 72% of patients partially or completely responded to the treatment. Of those studied, 28% of patients showed complete responseor disappearance of all signs of multiple myelomato Abecma, and 65% of this group remained in complete response to the treatment for at least 12 months.

Treatment with Abecma has the potential to cause severe side effects. The label carries a boxed warning for, cytokine release syndrome (CRS), hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis/macrophage activation syndrome (HLH/MAS), neurologic toxicity, and prolonged cytopenia, all of which can be fatal or life-threatening. CRS and HLH/MAS are systemic responses to the activation and proliferation of CAR-T cells causing high fever and flu-like symptoms, and prolonged cytopenia is a drop in the number of a certain blood cell type for an extended period of time. The most common side effects of Abecma include CRS, infections, fatigue, musculoskeletal pain, and a weakened immune system. Side effects from treatment usually appear within the first one to two weeks after treatment, but some side effects may occur later. Patients with multiple myeloma should consult with their health care professionals to determine whether Abecma is an appropriate treatment for them.

Because of the risk of CRS and neurologic toxicities, Abecma is being approved with a risk evaluation and mitigation strategy which includes elements to assure safe use. The FDA is requiring that hospitals and their associated clinics that dispense Abecma be specially certified and staff involved in the prescribing, dispensing or administering of Abecma are trained to recognize and manage CRS and nervous system toxicities and other side effects of Abecma. Also, patients must be informed of the potential serious side effects and of the importance of promptly returning to the treatment site if side effects develop after receiving Abecma.

To further evaluate the long-term safety, the FDA is also requiring the manufacturer to conduct a post-marketing observational study involving patients treated with Abecma.

Abecma was granted Orphan Drug and Breakthrough Therapy designations by the FDA. Orphan Drug designation provides incentives to assist and encourage the development of drugs for rare diseases. Breakthrough Therapy designation is a process designed to expedite the development and review of drugs that are intended to treat a serious condition and preliminary clinical evidence indicates that the drug may demonstrate substantial improvement over available therapy on a clinically significant endpoint(s). Breakthrough Therapy designation was granted based on sustained responses observed in patients with relapsed and refractory myeloma.

Drugs approved under expedited programs, such as Breakthrough Therapy designation, are held to the same approval standards as all other FDA approvals.

The FDA granted approval of Abecma to Celgene Corporation, a Bristol Myers Squibb company.

The FDA, an agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, protects the public health by assuring the safety, effectiveness, and security of human and veterinary drugs, vaccines and other biological products for human use, and medical devices. The agency also is responsible for the safety and security of our nations food supply, cosmetics, dietary supplements, products that give off electronic radiation, and for regulating tobacco products.

###

Read more:
FDA Approves First Cell-Based Gene Therapy for Adult ...

FDA announces first US gene therapy approval for cancer …

Story highlights

Kymriah works by genetically modifying a patient's own cells so they can attack the cancer

An advisory committee recommended the drug for approval in July

CNN

The US Food and Drug Administration approved a new leukemia treatment, which the agency considers the first gene therapy it has cleared to hit the market in the United States.

The treatment, called Kymriah, aims to give some patients a second chance after first-line drugs have failed. This may happen in up to a fifth of patients, according to the FDA.

Each dose of Kymriah contains a patients own immune cells, which are sent to a lab to be genetically modified using a virus. This therapy known as chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, or CAR-T gives the cells the ability to recognize and kill the source of the cancer.

Were entering a new frontier in medical innovation with the ability to reprogram a patients own cells to attack a deadly cancer, FDA Commissioner Dr. Scott Gottlieb said in a statement.

Price tag fears cast shadow over 'revolutionary' leukemia drug

Weve never seen anything like this before and I believe this therapy may become the new standard of care for this patient population, said Dr. Stephan Grupp, director of cancer immunotherapy at Childrens Hospital of Philadelphia, which spearheaded this research.

An FDA advisory committee had recommended the therapy for approval in July to treat the relapse of a blood cancer known as B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia, or ALL.

Based on available data, patients on the treatment have had an 89% chance of surviving at least six months and a 79% chance of surviving at least a year, with most being relapse-free at that point.

Almost 5,000 people were diagnosed with ALL in 2014, according to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. More than half were children and teens. ALL is the most common type of cancer among children, according to the National Cancer Institute.

Most patients with ALL recover through other treatments such as radiation, chemotherapy and stem cells. But if the cancer recurs, the prognosis is poor.

There has been an urgent need for novel treatment options that improve outcomes for patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell precursor ALL, Novartis, the drug company that makes Kymriah, said in a statement.

Killing cancer like the common cold

Kymriah is a first-of-its-kind treatment approach that fills an important unmet need for children and young adults with this serious disease, Dr. Peter Marks, director of the FDAs Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, said in a statement.

The one-time treatment has a boxed warning for cytokine release syndrome or CRS, a life-threatening side effect that can cause blood pressure to drop dangerously low. It is caused by overactive genetically modified immune cells. The FDA said hospitals and clinics must become certified to distribute the treatment, meaning they are prepared to recognize and treat CRS and other potentially fatal neurological events. Novartis said it hopes to have an initial network of 20 treatment centers within a month with plans to expand that to 32 by the end of the year.

Kymriah has a $475,000 price tag; however, patients who do not respond within a month of treatment will not be charged, according to Novartis.

Novartis is collaborating with (Centers for Medicaid Services) to make an outcomes-based approach available to allow for payment only when pediatric and young adult ALL patients respond to Kymriah by the end of the first month. Future potential indications would be reviewed for the most relevant outcomes-based approach, the drug company said in a statement.

On Wednesday, the FDA also expanded approval for another drug, tocilizumab, to treat CRS in patients 2 and older.

In the main study that informed the advisory committees decision in July, roughly half of 68 patients experienced high-grade CRS, though none died from it. Slightly fewer patients experienced neurological events, such as seizures and hallucinations.

Novartis is required to conduct followup study to assess the safety of the treatment long-term.

See the rest here:
FDA announces first US gene therapy approval for cancer ...

Gene Therapy for Hearing Loss on the Horizon : The Hearing Journal – LWW Journals

Turn up your hearing aid, will ya?

http://www.Shutterstock.com. Gene therapy, hearing loss.

As lewd and crude and rude as it sounds, it is the general response for the person on the street, even if muttered underneath his or her breath, when dealing with someonefriend, family, co-worker, etc.who suffers from mild to moderate hearing loss.

Aside from some surgical procedures that are not as commonly known, hearing deviceswhile being constantly upgraded in the digital agehave been the traditional source of help.

But there is one other ray of hope burgeoning on the horizon: Gene therapy.

From the Ivy League to the University of Miami to the University of Michigan to Oregon State to Tel Aviv, experts are on the verge of cracking the case.

Although not yet available, inner ear gene therapy for monogenic hearing loss is an emerging technology, explained Jeffrey R. Holt, PhD, a professor of Otolaryngology & Neurology at Harvard Medical School and of Boston Childrens -Hospital. There is growing interest from scientists, funding agencies, industry and patients, all spurred on by recent proof-of-concept studies showing recovery of auditory function in animal models of human hearing loss.

Holt added that genetic treatments for hearing loss sit on the horizon and the significance of this new therapeutic strategy for patients and families is high.

Nonetheless, he cautioned that the most common forms of genetic hearing loss, the result of mutations in GJB2, may be difficult to treat using gene therapy. Other rare forms of genetic hearing loss, due to mutations in OTOF, TMC1, or Usher syndrome, may be those first in line, but others will like follow.

Fan-Gang Zeng, PhD, the director of the Center of Hearing Research at the University of California-Irvine School of Medicine, explained that gene therapy addresses hearing loss biologically by repairing or restoring damaged cells, which hearing aids or cochlear implants do not accomplish.

Gene therapy is the future, but we dont know when the future will come, he said. While gene therapy is still in infancy, genetic screening of hearing loss is relatively matured. Concurrent screening with traditional audiological measures (OAE and ABR) and genetic testing can improve both the accuracy and prognosis of hearing loss while helping patients and doctors predict its course of development and management on an individual basis.

Yehoash Raphael, PhD, is a professor of Otolaryngology at the University of Michigans Kresge Research Institute. He has been recognized around the globe for his research, the interests of which include inner ear biology, protection and regeneration, gene therapy, genetic deafness, CHARGE Syndrome and stem cell therapy.

Raphael believes gene therapy should be advanced for several clinical conditions, both environmental and genetic.

At the cellular level, the goals would be related to repair and regeneration of cells that are injured or lost, he said. At present, amplification or cochlear implants provide an acceptable solution for many patients.

He cautioned, however, the biological therapy that restores function may work better, but is not currently available.

Ideally, we would like gene therapy to improve so it can be used for treating genetic deafness and sensorineural hearing loss caused by hair cell loss due to overstimulation, aminoglycosides, or infections, he said. As such, gene therapy presents an exciting prospect for future hearing restoration therapies.

At Michigan, Raphael and his colleagues are using combinatorial gene transfer methods to enhance the efficiency of new hair cells and are planning to enhance this approach and include other genes.

We are working on two mouse models for genetic inner ear disease, trying to better understand the biology of the mutation and also to design therapies, he said, adding that the research on therapies has met with mixed results.

Holts lab has focused on development of gene therapy for patients with mutations in TMC1 and for Usher syndrome patients.

We have remarkable data showing full recovery auditory function in some cases, he said. We are working with industry partners to bring these therapies into the clinic.

Meanwhile, in the private sector, companies such as Decibel Therapeutics are also seeking solutions.

According to Laurence Reid, PhD, it is simply a case of seeing the need and seeking to answer it.

The impact of significant hearing loss and balance disorders on individuals is profound and disrupts their connectivity with their human and physical environment, said Reid, the CEO of Decibel. We believe the inner ear represents an exciting new frontier for gene therapy, which will result in a pipeline of transformative medicines.

Reid added that the inner ear is an organ that is exquisitely suited to gene therapy. As such, the therapy can be delivered directly to the relevant cells, which are non-dividing and offer a durable potential for gene therapy. Lastly, the ear has a degree of immune privilege, which will moderate immune response against the therapy.

Said Reid, We are developing technologies that enable precision gene therapy, which will enable us to control the expression of the transgene in the gene therapy and limit the resulting pharmacology to precise cell types in which we intend to elicit a biological response.

Programs are in development to address both hearing loss and balance disorders and our therapies will comprise treatments for genetic forms of hearing loss, together with regenerative medicines, to treat acquired forms of hearing and balance disorders.

Looking ahead at the future of gene therapy as related to hearing loss, Raphael explained that the current technology for gene transfer for inner ear therapy needs to be improved in several cardinal and critical aspects to become a clinical reality.

He added that some of the parameters that need to be optimized include high cell-specificity, control of duration and extent of gene expression (how long and how much), acceptable route for delivering the vectors into the target site, and lack of toxicity and other side effects.

All these parameters are being addressed but still far from being accomplished, he said. Lack of accurate and reliable diagnostic tools, especially related to hair cell loss, also complicate the implementation of gene transfer technology.

Better technology would include upgraded batteries of tests that can predict the condition of the auditory epithelium, auditory nerve and other structures that are needed for biological hearing.

The promise of hearing restoration would become more realistic with these parameters resolved, he said.

Holt also cautioned against expected results tomorrow or the next day.

While hopes are high that this may soon be a therapeutic option for some patients with genetic hearing loss, it is important to keep in mind that a careful and systematic approach will be required to fully understand both the safety and efficacy of this treatment modality, he said. There are at least 100 forms of genetic hearing loss and each will need to be evaluated before use in patients can commence.

Reid further explained the importance of expanding access to genetic testing so families can understand the roots of their childs congenital hearing loss and seek out relevant clinical trials and ultimately tailored therapies.

Noting that accurate diagnosis of infant hearing loss is crucial to developing new treatments and providing clinical care, Reid added that Decibel hasin collaboration with Invitaelaunched Amplify, a sponsored testing program in the U.S. and Australia.

This program provides genetic testing at no charge for children with auditory neuropathy and aims to drive awareness of genetic testing and gain physician interest, as well as support enrollment into future clinical trials, he said.

What does all this mean for audiology professionals?

Holt predicts that audiologists will be an important part of the hearing health care team as this new wave of therapeutic options enters clinical trials, eventually wins approval, and becomes more broadly available.

He added that evaluation of auditory function before and after gene therapy treatments will be critical for understanding the efficacy, durability, and therapeutic window for hearing preservation and restoration.

In preparation for the coming wave, audiologists can understand basic genetics, familiarize themselves with the various genes associated with genetic hearing loss, and be prepared to field patient questions, he said. I suspect that as soon as the first inner ear gene therapies enter clinical trials, there will be an explosion of patient interest and inquiries. However, inner ear gene therapies will not be a magic bullet cure-all. Rather, a precision medicine approach will be required, as these therapies will need to be tailored to each patients specific genetic diagnosis.

Zeng had a similar view and explained that future audiologists will need to learn and understand the genetic component of hearing loss, which contributes half or more to the prevalence of hearing loss.

Dont expect gene therapy to be a silver bullet that can solve all the problems, said Zeng. There are a lot of things that gene therapy cannot solve (i.e., hearing loss related to mental issues).

Raphael made the distinction between audiologists doing research and clinicians, advising those in research to consider joining the research efforts to design diagnostic means that will determine presence/absence of hair cells and/or neurons, and if hair cells are absent, where in the cochlea this condition exists and what state the supporting cells are in.

He added: Are they differentiated or flat? The condition of supporting cells is an important factor in planning the set of genes that will be used to generate new hair cells.

Raphael explained that audiologists in the clinics need to be aware that there are currently no therapies based on gene transfer being offered. In some cases of genetic hearing loss, when the diagnosis is clear and the gene involved is not a very large gene, there is a chance that gene therapy could be offered in the relatively near future.

He added that this is especially true for mutations that affect hair cell, and where the hair cells survive but do not function properly.

I have a feeling that many of the patients asking about gene therapy options are those experiencing age-related hearing loss, which most of us are likely to develop at different speeds of progression, he said. Because many of these cases have long-term loss of hair cells and likely at least some neuronal regression or degeneration, the application of gene therapy would be very complex and challenging.

Reid added that, over the next several years, Decibel hopes that a range of pharmaceutical interventions will become available to people with hearing loss and their caregivers.

Audiologists will thus have therapeutic options in addition to the existing devices, which assist hearing improvement, he said. Diagnosis of particular forms of hearing loss will expand to include broader consideration of genetic mutations responsible for hearing loss.

Thoughts on something you read here? Write to us at [emailprotected]

See the original post:
Gene Therapy for Hearing Loss on the Horizon : The Hearing Journal - LWW Journals

Lifeline for dementia and ALS sufferers as UK company develops groundbreaking treatment – Daily Express

Dementia: Dr Sara on benefits of being in nature

AviadoBio has raised $80million (58.6million) to progress with their treatments for neurodegenerative disorders including frototemporal dementia and motor neurone disease - otherwise known as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). AviadoBio co-founder Christopher Shaw is a Professor of neurology and neurogenetics at Kings College London. He has spent the last 25 years investigating ALS and frontotemporal dementia.

Both are extremely aggressive diseases, for which there are currently no effective treatments.

The severity of the illnesses will allow Professor Shaw and his team to determine whether their groundbreaking experimental therapies have an impact relatively early on.

AviadoBios unique platform combines next-generation gene therapy design with deep neuroscience expertise and a novel neuroanatomy-led approach to drug delivery.

Frontotemporal dementia is associated with behavioural change and language loss.

The first programme works by supplementing a gene called progranulin, which when mutated is deficient.

AviadoBios approach is to deliver the progranulin gene to the brain using an adeno associated virus as a vector.

Instead of administering the doses intravenously or through the spinal fluid, surgery will be used to apply small amounts of the virus to the brain which will then distribute it naturally via neural networks.

Professor Shaw toldExpress.co.uk: Our approach is a surgical approach to get past the blood brain barrier, and also past the peel membrane to go into the brain - or into the spinal cord - to deliver the virus and were then using a sort of neural network to deliver the virus around the brain.

And because we're able to put it in the right place to do the right thing, we can use very small doses and we don't see an inflammatory response, which obviously would be a worry when you're when you're putting these agents into the brain.

We tap into this neural network, which then delivers to the cortex, which of course, is where the disease, frontotemporal dementia, has its greatest effect.

So we have to be able to supplement the genes missing in those cells, and thereby prevent the degeneration.

The team will start by treating symptomatic patients who are in the early phases of the disease.

But Professor Shaw hopes that if proven successful, the therapy can also be used to treat people who are genetically at risk from developing the disease thereby preventing them from becoming symptomatic later in life.

Another AviadoBio programme which will benefit from the huge funding works to knock down genes.

Many of the genes which cause neurodegeneration are toxic, so you cant just supplement them because that is not the problem, it is you body making a toxic protein, Professor Shaw explained.

To combat this, the team intends to target the messenger RNA (mRNA) of the toxic genes and using a micro-RNA platform to knock it down.

This is the kind of therapy which AviadoBio hopes can transform the lives of those suffering from motor neurone disease.

Professor Shaw explained: Motor neurone disease is a terrible paralysing illness usually kills people within three years of symptom onset and is the most common reason that people seek euthanasia.

So, it's a very, very severe disease that there is no effective treatment for.

People are absolutely desperate and we think we've got a really, really powerful therapeutic approach, which is to knock down the genes that are causing the disease.

And I think that's a really fantastic opportunity to really have an impact.

Working alongside Professor Shaw are his fellow co-founders: molecular neurobiologist Dr Youn Bok Lee and vector biologist Dr Do Young Lee from Kings College London and the UK Dementia Research Institute.

Lisa Deschamps, Chief Executive Officer, brings to the team 25 years of industry and extensive gene therapy experience.

Commenting on the $80million investment, she toldExpress.co.uk: We're extremely pleased with the raise and we feel very confident that there is tremendous interest.

We feel very confident that the 80 million will help us to advance our lead programme in progranulin, as well as look to accelerate the other pipeline assets.

Ms Deschamps said the money would help the team to collect more data and to hopefully get their therapies into clinics and dosing patients by the end of next year.

To get to that stage, they will need to get proof of safety and effective distribution in non-human primate studies.

After that data is collected, AviadoBio can apply for approval from the UK-based Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), and the American Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to allow them to run the human trial.

Professor Shaw added: Were so excited about this. Now we have got the funds to do the experiments properly and to actually offer this to patients who want to be part of the trial.

It is the next generation of therapies that are coming through - we haven't proven that they're curative yet, but that is our goal.

See the original post here:
Lifeline for dementia and ALS sufferers as UK company develops groundbreaking treatment - Daily Express

EP. 6B: Phenotypic Theranostics in the Future of Precision Medicine – Targeted Oncology

In September 2021, following the publication of results from the phase 3 VISION trial of lutetium (Lu)-177 PSMA-617 (LuPSMA) in select patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC),1 the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted priority review to LuPSMA.2

The FDAs decision comes on the heels of the trials positive results, which are explored in How the VISION trial may change prostate cancer therapy, the fourth article in this Targeted Oncology series, entitled New Precision Medicine Approaches in Advanced Prostate Cancer. However, it also comes after recent advances in genetic testing, biomarkers, nuclear imaging, and combination treatments for prostate cancer. These are discussed, respectively, in The role of imaging and genomic testing in prostate cancer therapy, New horizons in nuclear medicine for prostate cancer, and Expert perspective on the changing treatment spectrum for advanced prostate cancer, also in this series.

As the FDA reviews LuPSMA, experts have questions about this novel radiopharmaceutical and how it might be adopted in the US.

Ahead, Oliver Sartor, MD, medical director at Tulane Cancer Center in New Orleans, Louisiana, co-principal investigator of the VISION trial, and lead author of the published results, considers some of the questions about this novel radiopharmaceutical and how it might be adopted in the US. Dr. Sartor also discusses how the VISION trial fits into new prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) research and explores the future of phenotypic theranostics in precision medicine.

TARGETED ONCOLOGY: What are the key takeaways from the VISION trial?

SARTOR: I think there are a couple. No. 1 is [that] we really wanted to design a trial that would result in regulatory approval in multiple countries, so that was the goal starting out. Of course, we wanted to use the PSMA Lu-177 using the PSMA-617 targeting molecule. That was kind of where we started.

I also felt that having prolongation of survival as an end point was key. To meet it, we chose very difficult-to-treat patients. The patients who enrolled in VISION had already gone through chemotherapy and at least 1 taxane. Many of the patientsabout 40%had actually had 2 lines of a taxane chemotherapy prior to enrolling in the trial. Everyone was also required to have use[d] at least 1 novel hormone, but multiple novel hormones were allowed. Abiraterone and enzalutamide, for instance, would have previously been used. A substantial proportion of them had undergone not just 1 but 2 chemotherapies, and all of them had undergone multiple hormonal treatments. These patients were extremely difficult to treat.

We also used the PSMA PET scan to choose and exclude patients. We wanted to choose patients who have PSMA PET metastases greater than just in the liver. This wasn't a stringent criterion, but we wanted to make sure that everybody had PSMA positivity. We also excluded patients who had PSMA negativity, lymph nodes greater than 2.5 cm, or visceral lesions of more than 1 cm.[There] were [also] a variety of other inclusion criteria like adequate performance status, adequate bone marrow, etc.

Included patients were randomized to receive a nonchemotherapeutic standard of care [treatment]. This included additional hormones, radiation therapy, bisphosphonates, maybe steroids plus or minus the PSMA lutetium, etc. There was a 2-to-1 randomization. Overall survival (OS) was an end point. Also, after the trial was already designed, there was a radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) end point added. Patients were intended to be treated with at least 4 cycles for the PSMA lutetium and could receive up to 6 if there was evidence of clinical benefit. That's the basic framework of the trial.

The bottom line is we hit OS, and we hit rPFS. I think the safety profile was good. We also had health-related quality-of-life improvement for the PSMA lutetium. I believe this trial will result in multiple regulatory approvals, which was the goal that we set out to accomplish.

TARGETED ONCOLOGY: Based on findings from the VISION trial, what might we expect from ongoing clinical trials investigating Lu-PSMA-617 earlier in the natural history of prostate cancer?

SARTOR: Patients in the VISION trial had all failed a novel hormone and a taxane-based chemotherapy, so the VISION trial [included]advanced patient[s] with chemotherapy exposure. However, many patients with prostate cancer never receive chemotherapy, so were now starting a trial for patients with [m]CRPC called PSMAfore (NCT04689828), [which] doesn't require patients prior use of chemotherapy. Here, we're taking patients without chemotherapy exposure, but we're requiring that they have at least abiraterone or enzalutamide as a prior treatment. PSMAfore is moving forward with an rPFS end point with a crossover for those who are on the control arm, [so] they would have the opportunity to also receive PSMA lutetium. That trial is already accruing: I've already personally enrolled patients into the trial.

PSMAfore examines the castration-resistant space. We're also moving into the castration-sensitive space. In a phase 3 trial, we're going to be examining metastatic castrate-sensitive prostate cancer. Everybody receives androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) and a novel hormone. The novel hormone can be [the] doctor's choice: abiraterone, enzalutamide, or apalutamide, all of which are FDA approved. This trial [is] plus or minus the PSMA lutetium. Here again, we're using an rPFS end point. This is going to be a big global trial. It, too, is already accruing patients. We've already consented our first patient here in the United States, and it's accruing in multiple countries around the globe.

We're hopeful that these earlier stage trials with PSMA-617 lutetium are going to result in more regulatory approvals for less heavily pretreated patients than were present in VISION.

There's also another phase 3 trial called the SPLASH trial (NCT04647526) using a PSMA-targeted radiopharmaceutical. Again, [it is] Lu-177, but this time instead of PSMA-617, it is 177 Lu-PSMA-I&T.

The[re] are additional phase 3 trials in the mCRPC nonchemotherapy-pretreated space. These trials are not quite underway to the same degree that PSMAfore is. Nevertheless, I think they can add value as we move forward.

TARGETED ONCOLOGY: If approved, how might Lu-PSMA fit within the current treatment landscape for mCRPC? What challenges do you anticipate for the use or acceptance of this agent?

SARTOR: I think the first label will be in accordance with the VISION-selected patients: mCRPC by conventional imaging and prior treatment with both a novel hormone such as abiraterone or enzalutamide and at least 1 taxane. Everybody would need to be PSMA-positive on the PET scan in accordance with the criteria that we established in VISION, I anticipate. That might not be the case, but I suspect it will.

After approval, the barriers are going to be severalfold. No. 1, there are going to be a lot of patients who do not want chemotherapy and are not treated with chemotherapy. They're going to be frustrated that they can't get this agent because the FDA and other regulatory bodies, I think, are going to require the chemotherapy pre-treatment. That's going to be 1 issue, [and] that's going to be addressed with PSMAfore and others.

No. 2, there are already access issues in the United States for PSMA PET. Not all of the insurance companies have approved it. If a PSMA PET [scan] is required, then somehow all these PSMA PET scans are going to have to be performed. That's a potential holdup.

No. 3, I think that the specialties that are qualified to administer the radiopharmaceuticalseither nuclear medicine or radiation oncologymay be overwhelmed with the demand. I'm worried that not enough centers are going to be ready. Ideally, these patients should be under multidisciplinary care. These are individuals who have multiple potential complications. It's not just pushing an isotope and seeing the patient back in 6 weeks. Multidisciplinary care is optimal. However, getting these patients through multi-d[isciplinary] clinics [to be sent] to those who are qualified to administer the therapy and then ensuring that theyve had chemotherapy and getting them [PSMA] PET scans could all be a hindrance.

There are stumbling blocks that could be apparent, and I think we're going to have to watchall of these as we go forward.

TARGETED ONCOLOGY: Looking beyond Lu-PSMA and the VISION trial, what do you think is most important for clinicians to emphasize in future efforts to treat patients with advanced prostate cancer effectively?

SARTOR: No. 1, we really need to start multidisciplinary care as soon as possible. Everybody can add value to the patient. If a patient is seeing a radiation oncologist, involving a urologist may be of benefit. If somebody is seeing a urologist, a medical oncologist could be helpful. As we move forward, particularly in these complex cases of patients with multiple areas of metastatic disease, coming together as teams can play an important role.

No. 2, we need to be aware of genetics. There are genetically targeted therapies now available. Folks are aware of the PARP inhibitors for homologous recombination repair defects, but things like pembrolizumab are also important. I mention pembrolizumab by name as a PD-1 inhibitor because this is approved in the context of mismatch repair or microsatellite instability (MSI)-high alterations, or even high tumor mutational burdens. Genetic testing is something I think we need to keep in mind, because sometimes the patients can have very robust responses to targeted therapies, provided they have the appropriate genetic milieu.

No. 3, as we move forward, we have to be cognizant of supportive aspects of our care, such as bone health. We have realized that a lot of patients can have pathogenic fractures and pathologic fractures. Mitigating that risk with things like denosumab or zoledronic acid is an important role for our clinicians to play in the management of patients.

TARGETED ONCOLOGY: What are the most exciting or important areas for researchers in this field to focus on?

SARTOR: Im excited about several areas. No. 1 is combination therapies. Currently, PSMA [Lu]-177 is being evaluated in combination with things like PSMA actinium-225. It's being looked at in combination with DNA repair inhibitors such as the PARP inhibitor olaparib, it's being looked at in combination with the PD-1 inhibitors like pembrolizumab, [and] its being evaluated in combination with stereotactic body radiotherapy. As we move forward, combination therapies are important.

Additional isotopes, combinations of isotopes, bispecific antibodies, and novel hormonal targeting agents that are being developed are also exciting, so there's a lot for us to keep aware of as this field marches forward.

TARGETED ONCOLOGY: PSMA-based radiotracers are the latest in a line of biomarkers used in prostate cancer imaging. Do you foresee other biomarkers becoming relevant? What role might PSMA have alongside them?

SARTOR: Combinations of PET imaging may yield very interesting results. For instance, we're having trouble treating emerging neuroendocrine prostate cancer. Often, after previous treatment with agents like abiraterone and enzalutamide, these neuroendocrine phenotypes emerge. The cell surface markers for neuroendocrine phenotypes may be very interesting. I'll mention the bombesin receptor as one. It turns out that these neuroendocrine tumors express receptors beyond just PSMA.

I think PSMA is a fabulous target, by the way, [but] different ways to image PSMA may also be important. There [are] also image-based biomarkers related to the use of immunotherapy. Being able to image things like PD-L1 [may] also [be] quite important.

As we go forward, Im seeing a whole series of newer PET [bio]markers being evaluated, and utility [may be] growing out of even combinations. The Australians today use 18 F-FDG PET in combination with PSMA PET, and by the way, I think that could potentially add value, but it needs to be properly evaluated in the context of prospective trials.

TARGETED ONCOLOGY: What is on the short-term horizon for research in prostate cancer treatment?

SARTOR: I think the short-term horizon in prostate cancer is going to revolve [around] moving these novel radiopharmaceuticals closer to the front of therapy. I've mentioned several trials, including the SPLASH trial, the PSMAfore trial, and the PSMA addition trial, which is for castration-sensitive [prostate cancer], upfront. All of these are going to be actively accruing subjects. I don't think we'll have results in the next 12 to 18 months, but nevertheless, that's going to be the next chain. In addition, we're going to see the rise of these combination therapies initially in phase 1 moving on to phase 2. And then I think we're going to evolve a whole series of novel biomarkers, and these are going to require additional testing, of course, but the field of biomarkers is alive and well. [It is] evolving so, so rapidly right now.

TARGETED ONCOLOGY: As phenotypic theranostics advance, what might be the role of genotypic precision medicine in prostate cancer? Do you think that these 2 areas will grow alongside one another?

SARTOR: I do. When we talk about precision medicine, I think most [but not all] of what weve become accustomed to is related to the genomic alterations that occur in the context of cancer, but phenotypic alterations such as PSMA expression [are] not going to be something you can detect with a gene rearrangement. Its really about protein expression. I think this area also has a bright future. I mentioned very particularly the expression of neuroendocrine markers. I mentioned the bombesin receptor, which is a gastrin-releasing peptide (GRP) receptor. Maybe somatostatin receptors could be important. Maybe other alterations such as DLL3 could be important. These would be called phenotypic biomarkers as opposed to genotypic biomarkers, which would be things like BRCA2 mutations, mismatch repair, rearrangements, etc.

Precision medicine is going to evolve, I think, on multiple fronts. The beauty of a targeted radiopharmaceutical is that almost anything that you can bind to on the cell surface potentially becomes a target. That means were going to have a vastly expanded series, in my opinion, over the next several decades of targets on cell surfacesnot just for prostate cancer, but for a whole series of different cancers. Right now, we have neuroendocrine cancers of the midgut, the so-called carcinoids, and those neuroendocrine-type cancers that are targeted, but I envision many, many more theranostics going forward, and [LuPSMA] is just a first step.

References

1. Sartor O, de Bono J, Chi KN, et al. Lutetium-177-PSMA-617 for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.N Engl J Med. 2021;385(12):1091-1103. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2107322

2. FDA grants priority review for investigational targeted radioligand therapy 177Lu-PSMA-617 for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). News release. Novartis. September 28, 2021. Accessed December 9, 2021. https://www.novartis.com/news/fda-grants-priority-review-investigational-targeted-radioligand-therapy-177lu-psma-617-patients-metastatic-castration-resistant-prostate-cancer-mcrpc

Originally posted here:
EP. 6B: Phenotypic Theranostics in the Future of Precision Medicine - Targeted Oncology

MODY: A Rare but Increasingly Common Form of Diabetes – Healthline

It wasnt until a quarter century after being diagnosed with type 1 diabetes (T1D) that Lori Salsbury in Arkansas realized the condition shed been living with since she was 15 years old might not be what she thought it was.

Though her mom and sister were both initially misdiagnosed with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and later correctly dubbed T1Ds, Lori didnt have a reason at first to be suspicious of her own T1D diagnosis. Not until 2015, when she began seeing more people with diabetes sharing their stories online and realized something was off for her.

Sure, there is a mantra in our community that Your Diabetes May Vary. But for Salsbury, the particulars of her T1D just didnt match what she saw others in the D-Community sharing or what doctors and nurses described as the symptoms most newly diagnosed T1D experience.

At the time of her diagnosis, Salsbury was in her mid-20s and seemed quite healthy. She didnt get nauseous or sick, even a full day after missing an insulin dose. Her insulin dosing needs would change frequently, often sending her into super high glucose levels for weeks until adjusting her insulin or carb ratios; the same would happen on the low end of the scale.

One day, Salsbury heard about a rare, inherited form of diabetes called MODY (maturity onset diabetes of the young), that doesnt require as much insulin, at least initially. That piqued her interest.

She did some online research, and then consulted her endocrinologist and received antibody tests that came back negative. He also ran a C-peptide test that came back at T1D levels, but that was most likely due to her 20+ years of using insulin. A referral to a geneticist led to more bloodwork, and in January 2020 the findings came back showing a genetic mutation, which causes one of the several different known types of MODY.

MODY has the potential of changing how you manage your diabetes, depending on the particular form youre diagnosed with. Some changes could include stopping medications completely or changing from insulin to a different injectable or oral medication, while some MODY forms mandate changes in your diet.

In Salsburys case, the MODY diagnosis brought her some clarity, and finally an explanation of why her diabetes experience seemed so different than others in the T1D community. But she continues insulin therapy.

Since I was originally diagnosed T1D, I am still (labeled that) in my charts so that I wont lose coverage for my insulin pump and CGM that I require to live by, Salsbury said. Most often, if asked I just tell people that I was diagnosed with type 1. Its easier than going through the whole What is MODY? spiel.

The easiest way to think about MODY is that its a subset of diabetes caused by a mutation in one of at least 14 genes in a persons DNA. That mutation impacts the insulin-producing beta cells, which in turn impacts insulin production and glucose regulation.

Since just an estimated 1 to 2 percent of those with diabetes have a genetic mutation leading to MODY, there isnt much discussion about it within the patient community, and most medical professionals dont bring it up unless they are questioned. Yet some advocates and researchers believe the various types of MODY are more common than many think, and that view is becoming more accepted as genetic testing becomes more widely available.

The term MODY was first coined in the 1970s by pioneering researchers who identified what appeared to be a mild form of diabetes in children that didnt necessarily require insulin as was needed for those with the more common juvenile diabetes (before it was later renamed type 1). At that time, MODY was defined as fasting hyperglycemia diagnosed under age 25 which could be treated without insulin for more than two years, and it is inherited, as they found.

While most research existing shows its as rare as 1 to 2 percent of all diabetes cases, more current research now indicates that as many as 6.5 percent of children with antibody-negative diabetes may have a form of MODY.

MODY is passed down genetically from parent to child, making that the common thread for this form of diabetes compared to the other types that are autoimmune, partially genetic, or more lifestyle-based. The typical diagnosis comes before age 25, and its rarely diagnosed in those older than 35 or 40. While children have roughly a 50 percent chance of developing MODY if one of their parents has it, that does not mean mutations cant occur at random and appear in those without a family history of gene mutation.

The gene mutations arent the same for everyone, and they affect different organs in the body, meaning its difficult to diagnose without genetic testing, and it can be more challenging to recognize glucose fluctuations commonly found in those who are newly diagnosed.

Significantly, 80 percent of MODY cases are misdiagnosed as T1D or T2D as the signs are pretty much the same extreme thirst, increased urination, and weight loss. But some forms of MODY do not produce any symptoms. The number of misdiagnoses may be even higher at 95 percent in the United States, according to some researchers.

Dr. Miriam Udler at Massachusetts General Hospital is one of the more well-known names in MODY clinical research. She believes more cases are being diagnosed in recent years as genetic testing has become more available, particularly after COVID-19 led to a telehealth explosion and more at-home testing kits for bloodwork and diagnostic tests normally done in a lab.

Dr. Miriam Udler

It used to be rare and expensive, and that was a barrier to testing and diagnosing MODY correctly, she told DiabetesMine. But now, more providers have access to this and can order the tests to their clinics or patients at home, and insurance is increasingly covering MODY genetic testing.

While MODY is still less common and infrequently discussed in clinics, Udler says it comes down to that particular doctor or patient recognizing something might be different about their diabetes.

That matters a lot, and a correct diagnosis can change management, Udler said. In most common MODY forms, it could mean coming off medication.

For Salsbury, the particular BLK gene mutation she has causes MODY 11, an insulin secretion defect that makes her beta cells less responsive to glucose and leads to less insulin being sent out by the body when its needed. Being overweight is one common feature of this particular gene mutation, according to research.

Once MODY is recognized and diagnosed, it can also be difficult to regulate glucose levels in the same ways that T1D and T2Ds often do, because the symptoms and glucose levels can vary significantly.

As MODY 11 usually presents like T1D and is treated in much the same way, Salsbury has been using insulin since she was diagnosed at age 15 in 1991 and wears an Omnipod tubeless insulin pump and Dexcom CGM, combined into a homemade do-it-yourself (DIY) closed loop system. For her, life with MODY isnt much different from being T1D.

But she knows everyone is not as fortunate on that front and can have many challenges in getting a correct diagnosis and finding a management routine that works for their particular form of MODY.

In New York, Laurie Jones shares her story of being diagnosed at 30 with gestational diabetes late in her first pregnancy through the test often given to pregnant women. She changed her diet and followed it to the letter on exact carb and calorie allowances, and took varying doses of long and short-acting insulins. Though she describes it as intense, all signs of diabetes went away after her first pregnancy.

But within a few years during her second pregnancy, gestational diabetes returned. She began insulin injections right away as well as a strict diet, but Jones found it more difficult than before to regulate high and low blood sugars.

A number of years later, her A1C results were creeping higher and that led to a T2D diagnosis. She took Metformin on the advice of her doctor, but it didnt work to keep her blood sugars in check.

Most adult medicine endos do not push for MODY testing even when the medicine is not working, she explained. Being overweight is usually assumed the reason, therefore even star doctors dont push for MODY testing unless weight is lost.

Her sons diagnosis changed everything. When he was 6 years old, he was diagnosed with eosinophilic esophagitis, and that mandated a diet free of the top allergens. He was about 12 when she took him to an endocrinologist, as he was not growing and low on the weight scale and didnt show any signs of puberty. That endo noticed his blood sugars were elevated and assumed he was in the honeymoon period prior to becoming a fully diagnosed T1D.

Months progressed, and the doctor suggested it was MODY. Genetic testing led to a MODY 2 diagnosis.

We had no idea what that was, and before [the doctor] explained it to us, she noted that most endocrinologists and almost all doctors outside of major medical teaching and research hospitals have not heard of it, the D-Mom said.

After her sons diagnosis, Jones got her own genetic testing and learned she also had MODY 2.

Most controlled by diet, MODY 2 is one of the more common but less intensive forms of MODY that usually doesnt require insulin or other glucose-lowering meds.

That led her to stopping Metformin, and shes been eating healthier and managing her weight for better glucose levels.

MODY 2 is not just about how you produce or use insulin, but mainly when you produce the insulin, she said. We were both told that our pancreas is like a house cooling or heating system that is off-kilter. Basically, our sugar levels have to get much higher than what is considered normal before the pancreas produces insulin. There are also insulin efficiency issues.

Without her sons diagnosis, Jones doesnt think she wouldve ever had the needed genetic testing and would have remained with a T2D diagnosis taking the wrong medications.

Thats likely the story for so many people in our D-Community, she believes.

With a 50 percent chance of being passed on, chances are MODY is not as rare as it is now believed, Salsbury said. If more people knew of it and were tested, we may come to find out that it is the most common or second only to T2D in commonality.

Importantly, a correct MODY diagnosis can highlight other health issues that might potentially arise. For example, a MODY 11 mutation to the BLK gene can increase the chances of developing systemic lupus erethematosus (SLE).

While being correctly diagnosed as MODY may not change your treatment, it can give you other information, Salsbury said. Many forms of MODY also come along with other health issues that the mutation may have caused. Knowing you have MODY can alert your doctors to watch you or check you for other related health conditions.

Researchers note the same, including Dr. Toni Pollin, a genetic researcher and counselor who in 2016 co-founded the Monogenic Diabetes Research and Advocacy Project (MDRAP) at the University of Maryland School of Medicine. The MDRAP effort promotes the correct diagnosis of MODY and also helps raise money for that effort. She co-founded MDRAP with a patient advocate whod been diagnosed with a form of MODY.

While improving MODY diagnosis will certainly improve the clinical care for patients, it will also have broader implications, researchers wrote in this 2015-published Undiagnosed MODY: Time for Action manuscript. Screening and genetic testing for MODY among patients with diabetes will provide a model for identifying and diagnosing highly penetrant forms of other otherwise common complex diseases [through] the power of genetics and genomics for improving patient care and public health.

View post:
MODY: A Rare but Increasingly Common Form of Diabetes - Healthline

Nucleic Acid Based Gene Therapy Market Analysis Of Industry Trends And Market Growth Opportunities As Per The Business Research Company’s Nucleic Acid…

This report describes and evaluates the global nucleic acid-based gene therapy market. It covers three five-year periods, including 2015 to -2020, termed the historic period, 2020-2025 forecast period and 2025-2030 a further forecast period.

LONDON, Oct. 05, 2021 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- According to The Business Research Companys research report on the nucleic acid-based gene therapy market, companies in the nucleic acid-based gene therapy market and research institutes are increasing the number of pipeline studies to develop gene therapy to treat various diseases. Companies have also started investing in startups and other early-stage companies to develop pipelines for gene therapies. Cell and gene therapies (CGT) have transformed not only how humans treat intractable and genetic diseases, but also reformed the entire pharmaceutical ecosystem. As of 2019, more than 27 CGT products were launched across the globe and nearly 990 companies are engaged in the commercialization, and research & development of next-generation therapies. Additionally, there are more than 1,000 regenerative medicine trials taking place across the globe.

Such global nucleic acid based gene therapy market trends are obtainable with nucleic acid-based gene therapy manufacturers progressively investing in the launch of new manufacturing facilities and product portfolio expansion to meet the increasing demand for gene therapy and related products. Players operating in the nucleic acid-based gene therapy market are gradually investing in the developing regions to capitalize on untapped market opportunities. For example, in September 2021, Viralgen, a Bayer-owned CDMO, spent upwards of 50 million (US$ 55 million) to expand its capacity for gene therapy manufacturing services at its Miramon Technology Park site in San Sebastian, Spain. The commercial facility will have nine cleanrooms, each with a batch capacity of up to 2,000 L. Viralgen claims that this has expanded its existing viral vector capacity 15-fold, helping to meet the demand for gene therapy production. In addition, in May 2021, AGC Biologics, a global biopharmaceutical contract development and manufacturing organization (CDMO), announced plans to expand their Gene Therapy Center of Excellence in Milan, Italy.

Story continues

Major players in the nucleic acid gene therapy market include Copernicus Therapeutics, Moderna Inc., Wave Life Sciences, Protagonist Therapeutics and Transgene.

The Business Research Companys report titled Nucleic Acid Based Gene Therapy Global Market Report 2021 - By Technology (Anti-Sence and Anti-Gene, Short Inhibitory Sequences, Gene Transfer Therapy, Nucleoside Analogs, Ribozymes, Aptamers), By Application (Oncology, Muscular Dystrophy/ Muscular Disorders, Rare Diseases), By End User (Hospitals And Clinics, Academic And Research Institutes), COVID-19 Growth And Change covers major nucleic acid based gene therapy companies, nucleic acid based gene therapy market share by company, nucleic acid based gene therapy manufacturers, nucleic acid based gene therapy market size, and nucleic acid based gene therapy market forecasts. The report also covers the global nucleic acid based gene therapy market and its segments.

Request For A Sample Of The Global Nucleic Acid Based Gene Therapy Market Report:

https://www.thebusinessresearchcompany.com/sample.aspx?id=2820&type=smp

The global nucleic acid based gene therapy market size is expected to grow from $0.56 billion in 2020 to $0.61 billion in 2021 at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 8.9%. The growth is mainly due to the companies resuming their operations and adapting to the new normal while recovering from the COVID-19 impact, which had earlier led to restrictive containment measures involving social distancing, remote working, and the closure of commercial activities that resulted in operational challenges. The nucleic acid-based gene therapy market is expected to reach $0.85 billion in 2025 at a CAGR of 9%.

North America is the largest region in the global nucleic acid-based gene therapy market, accounting for 46.2% of the total in 2020. It is followed by the Western Europe, Asia Pacific and then the other regions. Going forward, the fastest-growing regions in the nucleic acid-based gene therapy market will be the Middle East and Eastern Europe where growth will be at CAGRs of 33.7% and 26.0% respectively. These will be followed by South America and Asia Pacific, where the markets are expected to register CAGRs of 21.0% and 20.4% respectively.

The nucleic acid-based gene therapy market covered in this report is segmented by technology into anti-sense and anti-gene, short inhibitory sequences, gene transfer therapy, nucleoside analogs, ribozymes, aptamers, others. It is also segmented by application into oncology, muscular dystrophy/ muscular disorders, rare diseases and by end user into hospitals and clinics, academic and research institutes.

The top opportunities in the nucleic acid-based gene therapy market segmented by technology will arise in the anti-sense and anti-gene oligonucleotides segment, which will gain $1,290.7 million of global annual sales by 2025. The top opportunities segmented by application will arise in the muscular dystrophy/muscular disorders segment, which will gain $1,000.2 million of global annual sales by 2025, segmented by end-user will arise in the hospitals and clinics segment, which will gain $2,133.7 million of global annual sales by 2025. The nucleic acid-based gene therapy market size will gain the most in the USA at $915.0 million.

Nucleic Acid Based Gene Therapy Global Market Report 2021 COVID-19 Growth And Change is one of a series of new reports from The Business Research Company that provide nucleic acid-based gene therapy market overviews, nucleic acid-based gene therapy market analyze and forecast market size and growth for the whole market, nucleic acid-based gene therapy market segments and geographies, nucleic acid-based gene therapy market trends, nucleic acid-based gene therapy market drivers, nucleic acid-based gene therapy market restraints, nucleic acid-based gene therapy market leading competitors revenues, profiles and market shares in over 1,000 industry reports, covering over 2,500 market segments and 60 geographies.

The report also gives in-depth analysis of the impact of COVID-19 on the market. The reports draw on 150,000 datasets, extensive secondary research, and exclusive insights from interviews with industry leaders. A highly experienced and expert team of analysts and modelers provides market analysis and forecasts. The reports identify top countries and segments for opportunities and strategies based on market trends and leading competitors approaches.

Here Is A List Of Similar Reports By The Business Research Company:

Gene Editing Global Market Report 2021 - By Technology (CRISPR, TALEN, ZFN), By End Users (Biotechnology, Pharmaceutical, Contract Research Organization), By Application (Animal Genetic Engineering, Plant Genetic Engineering, Cell Line Engineering), COVID-19 Growth And Change

CRISPR Technology Global Market Report 2021 - By Product Type (Design Tools, Plasmid And Vector, Cas9 And G-RNA, Delivery System Products), By Application (Genome Editing/ Genetic Engineering, Genetically Modified Organisms, Agricultural Biotechnology), By End-User (Industrial Biotech, Biological Research, Agricultural Research, Therapeutics And Drug Discovery), COVID-19 Growth And Change

Stem Cell Therapy Global Market Report 2021 - By Type (Allogeneic Stem Cell Therapy, Autologous Stem Cell Therapy), By Cell Source (Adult Stem Cells, Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells, Embryonic Stem Cells), By Application (Musculoskeletal Disorders, Wounds And Injuries, Cancer, Autoimmune Disorders), By End-User (Hospitals, Clinics), COVID-19 Growth And Change

Interested to know more about The Business Research Company?

The Business Research Company is a market intelligence firm that excels in company, market, and consumer research. Located globally it has specialist consultants in a wide range of industries including manufacturing, healthcare, financial services, chemicals, and technology.

Get a quick glimpse of our services here: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC24_fI0rV8cR5DxlCpgmyFQ

The Worlds Most Comprehensive Database

The Business Research Companys flagship product, Global Market Model, is a market intelligence platform covering various macroeconomic indicators and metrics across 60 geographies and 27 industries. The Global Market Model covers multi-layered datasets which help its users assess supply-demand gaps.

Go here to read the rest:
Nucleic Acid Based Gene Therapy Market Analysis Of Industry Trends And Market Growth Opportunities As Per The Business Research Company's Nucleic Acid...

STIs Reached Record Highs, Then COVID-19 Hit. Test Makers Now Ponder What’s Next – GenomeWeb

NEW YORK As the COVID-19 pandemic pushes into a third year, public health experts and PCR-based assay makers are eager to know whether an increase in sexually transmitted infections is on the horizon.

Rates of STIs in the US had been rising for a decade until lockdowns in the early days of the pandemic led to a sharp reduction in STI testing and screening. Although levels have since recovered, experts are uncertain whether missed cases will lead to increased STI rates, or whether the impact will be offset by pandemic-related changes in sexual behavior.

For developers of STI tests, that uncertaintycouldpresentchallenges as they try to prepare and prioritize for the future.

STIs aren't usually fatal, but they can still create a myriad of personal and public health issues. Chronic, untreated infections in women cause pelvic inflammatory disease in about 12 percent of cases according to one estimate, and approximately 1 in 5 PID cases will result in infertility. Even an asymptomatic STI can increase a person's risk of picking up other infections, like HIV, and STIs can lead to complications for pregnant people and their babies, including infant death in cases of congenital infection.

The majority of people infected with two of the most prevalent STIs chlamydia and gonorrhea have no symptoms whatsoever. For chlamydia, an estimated 90 percent of cases in males are asymptomatic, as are between 70 and 95 percent of cases in females. Gonorrhea infections are also asymptomatic in a little more than half of all cases.

To tamp down rising rates of these infections, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends annual screening using nucleic acid amplification tests, and screening up to four times per year for some high-risk groups. Symptomatic cases are also frequently tested using molecular diagnostics, with gonorrhea in particular also isolated and cultured for national reporting and surveillance.

But not only did the pandemic lead to shortages in sample collection and preparation devices, testing reagents, and healthcare and lab staff, it also saw fewer people willing to step into a clinician's office for routine screening.

Overall, STI rates in the US had already risen to an all-time high in 2019, continuing a trend that had been going on for six consecutive years, according to the CDC.

The agency's 2019 STD Surveillance Report, published in April 2021, noted that there were 1,808,703 cases of Chlamydia trachomatis and 616,392 cases of gonorrhea reported to the CDC in 2019. In total, there were 2.5 million reported cases of chlamydia, gonorrhea, and syphilis the three most commonly reported STDs that year which represented a nearly 30 percent increase between 2015 and 2019, CDC said.

Then, COVID happened, resulting in a dramatic reduction in the number of detected STI cases, according to local as well as national data.

BarbaraVan Der Pol runs a clinical microbiology lab at the University of Alabama, Birmingham, and specializes in STIs. The precarious state of plastic consumables and sample prep supplies for molecular testing led her lab, and many others, to restrict STI testing to symptomatic cases and pivot their resources to COVID testing.

"There were three months where nobody in the country could get collection devices, because the same swab used for STI specimens was being used to collect nasal swabs," Van Der Pol said in a recent interview. Just as her lab had restarted its full-capacity STI clinical lab testing a few months ago,the Delta variant came roaring in, and now some of the supplies the lab needs for STI testing are in short supply again, she said.

In a study published online in theAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine in May, Van Der Pol and colleagues from Quest Diagnostics and Pennsylvania State University reported CT/NG screening hit a low point in April 2020.

The team saw a 59 percent decrease in screening for female patients and a 63 percent decrease for male patients. Further, the results correlated with increases in positivity rates for both chlamydia and gonorrhea.

Overall, the team estimated that in their sample, there were 27,659 cases of chlamydia and 5,577 chases of gonorrhea missed between March and June of 2020.

Philip Chan, a physician and researcher at Brown University who treats STIs in Rhode Island, noted that staff in health departments and publicly funded clinics shifted from STIs to COVID-19 response. Data recently published by him and his team also showed that the pandemic significantly reduced the average number of STI clinic visits per week.

Nationally, reported STI diagnoses dropped significantly, then resurged in 2020 due to COVID-19 lockdowns, according to the CDC. Specifically, a CDC study in Sexually Transmitted Diseases showed that during the most restrictive period of pandemic lockdowns in early April 2020, chlamydia cases dropped nearly 50 percent compared to the same time in 2019. Reported gonorrhea infections fell more than 71 percent, and syphilis infection diagnoses dropped nearly 64 percent. In April 2020 alone, the CDC estimated that roughly 30,000 gonorrhea cases went undetected.

Through a spokesperson, the CDC said three factors likely contributed to the initial decrease in reported cases: reduced screening, limited resources, and stay-at-home orders which may have influenced sexual behaviors and reduced STD transmission.

Yet, by the end of 2020 infection detection resurged, according to CDC data, and the missed cases were mostly recouped. The cumulative total number of cases in the US was just 1 percent lower for syphilis and 14 percent lower for chlamydia for the year than expected, and cumulative numbers of gonorrhea infections were more than 7 percent higher compared to 2019, implying a resurgence of cases.

Commercial perspectives

In September 2020, the CDC issued guidance to healthcare providers on ways to prioritize testing during a national shortage of chlamydia and gonorrhea molecular diagnostic test kits and laboratory supplies.

"The shortages affect multiple diagnostic companies, public health and commercial laboratories, and impact several components of the specimen collection and testing process," the agency wrote in the Dear Colleague Letter.

The agency provided an update in June 2021, noting that "one of the main manufacturers of chlamydia/gonorrhea diagnostic test kits is reporting to CDC that their STI diagnostic test supplies are readily available at normal levels," while other manufacturers reported "continued improvement" in product availability and anticipated "near normal levels" of supplies in the coming months.

Major suppliers of molecular diagnostic tests for STIs including Roche, Hologic, and Becton Dickinson report that STI assay ordering dropped off significantly last year, but that ordering and availability have mostly returned to pre-pandemic rates.

Cindy Perettie, head of Molecular Labs at Roche, said that early in the pandemic the firm invested to scale up production capacity across its core diagnostics business, but that "Roche observed a core business decline, including STIs, at the start of the pandemic," with declines corresponding to peaks in COVID-19 across the world.

But now, Roche has seen an increase in STI testing demand across several of its lab customers, and the firm plans to support higher testing volumes, Perettie said. "We work closely with our country affiliates and customers to plan, as accurately as possible, future demands, in order to secure and safeguard our manufacturing and distribution capabilities," she added.

Kevin Thornal, Hologic's division president of diagnostic solutions, said that Hologic also experienced a significant drop in demand for its STI assays in the spring and summer of 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. "This allowed us to divert some of our manufacturing capacity to production of our Aptima SARS-CoV-2 assay to help meet the rapidly escalating public health need for COVID testing," he said.

Simultaneously, Hologic also initiated aggressive efforts to increase its molecular diagnostics capacities at its San Diego and Manchester, UK, manufacturing sites.

"As of today, demand for STI assays has reverted to nearly pre-pandemic levels, while the need for COVID testing remains high," Thornal noted. But, because of the increased production capacities, the firm is "currently meeting demand on all fronts."

Hologic is also continuing its manufacturing expansion. "We are on track to have the capacity to make at least 75 million tests a quarter across our portfolio by early 2022, which is more than triple our pre-pandemic capacity," Thornal also said.

At Becton Dickinson, Chris Beddard, business line leader of core MDx and women's health and cancer at BD Integrated Diagnostic Solutions, said the firm focused on COVID-19 assay manufacturing in the early months of the pandemic.

However, BD manufactures STI tests on multiple platforms, including the BD Viper XTR and BD Viper LT Systems, and the firm has been able to maintain asteady supply consistent with customer demands, and "unimpacted by COVID-19 test manufacturing," Beddard said.

Nevertheless, BD also experienced declines in demand for STI assays early in the pandemic "as laboratories were, of course, focusing resources to support the urgent need for COVID-19 testing," Beddard said, while people were perhaps reluctant to visit physicians for routine and non-COVID-related health concerns.

BD has since seen demand return to pre-COVID levels.

"It is difficult to predict the immediate- and long-term impact on STI rates that the pandemic may have, but BD continues to have the capacity to expand, to innovate, and to address customer demands and changes in the healthcare landscape," Beddard said.

Resistance, risk, and innovation

What the ultimate consequence of missed cases will be on future STI rates is unknown, and may not be known for years to come.

Charles Cartwright, senior VP of clinical affairs at SpeeDx, suggested in an interview that an explosion in cases may not happen, but even so, "it will take three or four years before that is actually able to be analyzed," he said, in part because surveillance data takes a long time to be published.

Rates of antimicrobial resistance, particularly for gonorrhea, may also potentially be impacted.

SpeeDx offers a gonorrhea diagnostic test that supports "resistance-guided therapy," essentially detecting whether an infection is susceptible to a second-tier antibiotic. The firm partnered with Roche last year to offer its resistance assays, and Perettie said Roche saw this as a unique opportunity to extend an important test to its customers, as AMR STIs are "now listed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention as key threats due to the rising resistance and the limited available treatment options." In the long term, Roche sees the partnership as "a key strategic goal" to extend solutions to customers as quickly as possible, Perettie also said.

The increase in reported gonorrhea cases in the CDC's preliminary 2020 data is "definitely concerning," the agency spokesperson said, and it is something the CDC is continuing to study.

Past data suggest that about half of all gonorrhea cases are resistant to at least one antibiotic. CDC has not completed analysis for its 2020 resistance monitoring data, but indications are that there could be an upswing in antibiotic resistance.

For example, without treatment, people may have been carrying gonorrhea infections for a longer time, which increases the chance of the bacteria developing resistance. Asymptomatic oral and rectal infections, in particular, may have gone undetected due to decreased screening, and these sites are more prone to encourage resistance development through horizontal gene transfer with other commensal bacteria.

The newest CDC STI guidelines recommend gonorrhea be treated with an injectable antibiotic, and it is possible there were more cases treated with a less effective oral treatment at times when access to clinical settings was limited or difficult, a CDC spokesperson also said. This is particularly relevant for oral gonorrhea because almost all of these infections are asymptomatic and so, detection depends on screening.

The CDC confirmed that its Gonococcal Isolate Surveillance Project, or GISP,was able to continue surveillance throughout the pandemic.

However, some participating clinics were closed, STI patients were not always the highest priority, health department staff were moved to COVID-19 duties, and testing facilities were short on test kits and lab equipment. The ways all these factors ultimately impacted the GISP program are still being evaluated.

Different groups may also be differently impacted by STIs due to a historic lack of care, aversion to seeking treatment, or prevalence of practices that better enable certain transmission events.

The CDC noted in its report on 2019's rates that certain populations had already been disproportionately impacted by STIs. Many nonwhite populations, for example, have significantly higher rates of STIs, including African Americans, whose STI rates were as much as eight times higher than for non-Hispanic white people. Meanwhile, American Indian, Alaska Native, Native Hawaiian and other Pacific Islander populations were as much as five times higher, and Hispanics had STI rates twice as high.

Also, gay and bisexual men who have sex with men made up nearly half of the total number of primary and secondary syphilis cases in 2019, and in some areas of the US, rates of gonorrhea among this group were 42 times that of heterosexual men.

And young people specifically ages 15 to 24 are also disproportionately impacted, making up 61 percent of the nation's chlamydia cases in 2019 and 42 percent of all gonorrhea cases.

The CDC noted in its assessment that pre-existing disparities in STI services may now also be impacted by staff returning to STI testing labs burnt out by stints of COVID testing. On the other hand, the CDC identified "several new and innovative ways STD services can meet more people where they are" during the COVID-19 pandemic and in the future.

These include walk-in STD express clinics, partnerships with pharmacies and retail health clinics, telehealth, and new support for self-testing and patient-collected specimens.

Prognostication

At least one epidemiological model of chlamydia screening suggests that there would have been twice as many infections if there had been no screening programs and notification of partners between 2000 and 2015. Nevertheless, it is possible thatmissed cases and limited testing resources during the pandemic will be offset by the stay-at-home orders, which may have affected sexual behaviors.

Given that STIs have been increasing for the past decade, Brown's Chan said they will likely continue to increase. But, although clinics saw fewer patients, "on the flip side, I think people were socializing less ... and less socializing means, in many cases, less sex." Anecdotally, Chan said some of the higher-risk patients he sees, who typically have many sexual partners, seem to have picked a single partner with whom to get through the pandemic.

Point-of-care STI tests are also on the cusp of making an impact, and Chan noted that the research that went into COVID diagnostics could hopefully translate to other public health concerns, like STIs.

SpeeDx's Cartwright also highlighted that COVID-19 led many firms, includingSpeeDx, to dramatically scale up manufacturing capacity across the spectrum of molecular diagnostics. "Big instrument companies have placed a lot of instruments, and companies like ours have greatly increased our ability to manufacture large amounts of product to meet demand," he said.

Given the number of COVID tests being run daily, "there will be a huge amount of excess capacity in laboratory testing" when the pandemic ends. Combined with an influx in cash, Cartwright said diagnostics companies may become less nervous about menu expansion intoSTIs, which would in turn help to grow the market.

Still, whether diseases that tend to more strongly impact marginalized groups can ever be given enough attention and funding to be fully controlled is an open question. Van Der Pol noted that STI funding is "orders of magnitude less" than funding for HIV research, for example.

Similarly, antibiotic resistance in gonorrhea is a growing problem, and STIs continue to be especially problematic for women who are of reproductive age. Van Der Pol suggested that this demographic is most likely to be impacted by missed cases during the pandemic. "I think we are going to see a lot of infertility coming out of this, since people will have had untreated infections that have gone on for a year or more," she said.

The solution, ultimately, is to declare that "these are important infections that we should always be paying attention to," and for society to get over the stigma and learn to talk about STIs, Van Der Pol said.

"Hiding them is part of why we are not getting rid of them," she said.

More here:
STIs Reached Record Highs, Then COVID-19 Hit. Test Makers Now Ponder What's Next - GenomeWeb