Illustration by Camila Carlow  
    Ophir Klein is growing teeth,which is just    slightly less odd than what Jeffrey    Bush is growing  tissues that make up the face. Jason Pomerantz is growing muscle; Sarah    Knox is growing salivary glands; and Edward    Hsiao is printing 3-D bone using a machine that looks about    as complex as a clock radio.  
    Together, these members of the UC San Francisco    facultyare cultivating organs of the craniofacial complex     the skull and face  which too often go terribly wrong during    fetal development. Deformities of these bones or soft tissues,    the most common of birth defects, can cut life short by    blocking the airway or circulation. Or they can disfigure a    face so profoundly that a child strugglesto see, hear, or    talk. Perhaps most painful of all, such deformities render    children physically other, potentially leading to a    lifetime of corrective surgeries and social isolation.  
    As director of the UCSF Program in Craniofacial Biology, Klein    orchestrates a multisite research endeavor to translate basic    science findings in tissue regeneration into improved    treatments for these kids. Using stem cells from patients with    craniofacial deformities, Klein, Bush, Pomerantz, Knox, Hsiao,    and their colleagues are growing tiny functioning segments of    organs, called organoids, to figure out exactly when and how in    fetal development such design flaws occur.  
      Read a digital flipbook of the entire summer      issue of UCSF Magazine, featuring this and other      stories.    
    They are among scientists across UCSF who are cultivating    cellular systems such as miniature brains and breasts from    patient cells. They serve as dioramas of disease  models    derived from human cells  either displacing or complementing    the mouse models that have served science well, though    inexactly, for manyyears. The effort is one of the most    obvious and viable payoffs to date from stem cell science. With    these organoids, physicians and scientists can not only trace    the pathways of normal and abnormal development, but also test    drugs and other treatments for their effectiveness in humans.    Organoids are also one tiny step toward the ultimate goal of    generating complete organs, as a way to circumvent rejection    issues and save the lives of those who now die waiting for    transplants.  
    As the reservoirs of human development, stem cells take it upon    themselves to tirelessly renew and differentiate into the    myriad cell types required to build out a body from an embryo.    In creating an organoid, typical construction metaphors do not    apply. There are no building blocks to nail, stack, or solder    and no job-site supervisor barking orders. Thats not how    biology works, says Zev    Gartner, PhD, an associate professor of pharmaceutical    chemistry.  
    It is a self-organizing process, he explains, a process that    starts in the womb with embryonic stem cells (ESCs) or, in the    case of organoids, induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs).    iPSCs are mature cells that are stripped back to their earliest    stage of development using a process devised by UCSF Professor    of Anatomy Shinya Yamanaka, MD, PhD, who     won a Nobel Prize for discovering the process. To make    organoids, iPSCs are put through a series of solutions, then    added to a gel that mimics the squishy 3-D cellular matrix of    the embryo. The gel provides the right conditions for them to    get to work.  
    Take an organ like the lung. Its basic functional units are a    tube and a sac, and outside that sac are capillaries that allow    gas exchange. Hundreds of millions of tubes and sacs make a    lung, explains Gartner. You can make the little sacs and the    tubes in a dish as an organoid model. But we dont know how to    drive the self-organization of those units into much more    complex, elaborate, highly ramified structures. The    fundamental limitation of organoids is that they lack the    vasculature that brings nutrient-laden blood to fuel the    evolution of the larger structure.  
    Gartner notes that people who work with stem cells tend to    focus on either regenerative medicine or disease modeling.    Those interested in disease make models of tissues so that they    can understand how diseases work, while those interested in    regenerative medicine try to make models of healthy tissue that    couldbe transplanted. Gartner straddles both camps. He    grows breast organoids. The mammary gland is great because we    can simultaneously think about these two phenomena as two sides    of the same coin, he says. One is regenerative medicine    through self-organization, and the other is understanding the    progression of breast cancer through a breakdown in    self-organization.  
    So theres potentially a triple payoff in stem cell science: By    deducing how a breast forms itself, Gartner might figure out    how to grow the entire organ. By tracing how cancer throws a    wrench in the works, he may be able to target ways to stop that    process. And by growing a human organ in a dish, he avoids    making cross-species assumptions or putting animals or humans    at risk in testing potential drugs to cure breast cancer,    greatly accelerating the push toward a cure.  
    On Kleins team, Jeffrey Bush, PhD, an assistant professor of    cell and tissue biology, looks at organoids through the lens of    disease.  
    The organoids he grows model craniofrontonasal syndrome  a    birth defect that is caused by a mutation in a single gene and    that dramatically impacts the shape of the face and head. He    knows from studies reproducing craniofrontonasal syndrome in    mice that the first place something goes wrong is in a cell    type called the neuroectoderm. To create an organoid to study    this, he obtained skin cells from Pomerantz, an associate    professor of surgery, who has patients with the syndrome who    were willing to donate tissue samples. Such collaborations    between basic scientists and clinicians are key to bringing    research out of the lab and into patient care.  
    We studied this simple system to see how this mutation    affected the organization of these cells, says Bush. His group    has filmed cells as they rush about to self-organize when    theyre mixed together. In those films, he explains, you can    see that the mutated cells, which are dyed red, segregate from    the normal cells, which are green  they are like oil and    water. In other words, the mutated cells completely disrupt    the behavior of all the cells. By contrast, in the films of    cells without the mutation, all the cells circulate easily    among one another, like fish in an aquarium. This understanding    has allowed Bush to begin to think about a drug that blocks    this separation. He has several promising candidates that his    team will test in pregnant mice. Right now, he says, there    isnt a single drug that we can use for any kind of structural    birth defects. If we could show that a medication blocks the    effects of this mutation, it would serve as proof of principle    that something besides surgery can be done. But we would have    to know that it was safe for mother and child and that we could    catch it early enough.  
    Jason Pomerantz, MD, a plastic surgeon, falls into the    regeneration camp. His clinical work is typified by a recent    eight-hour operationon a 17-year-old boy with Crouzon    syndrome, a severely disfiguring condition affecting every    organ in the craniofacial structure  muscle, bone, and skin.    My patient is excited for the outcome, but not about the    process, says Pomerantz, surgical director of the UCSF Craniofacial Center. For three months, the    patient will wear a large metal frame on his head with wires    that will pull the bones in his face forward. Prior to the    surgery, the boys face was nearly concave, collapsed inward at    the nose.  
    Yet bone is not all Pomerantz needs to work with to restructure    a face. The subtle bends, creases, and curves of    expressionthat make a face ones own are the work of tiny    muscles.Right now we can move a big muscle  say, from    the thighto the face  so that people can smile, he    says. But we cant reconstruct the fine ones that enable    people to move their eyebrows up or move the eyeballs around.    That requires little muscles. This is where we can make headway    with stem cell biology.  
    We have actually made a humanized organ in an animal, he    continues, pointing to a picture of a mouse on his wall.    Pomerantz is now considering incubating small human muscles in    animals for use in his patients faces. In a recent project, he    inserted stem cells from human muscles into a mouse whose own    muscle stem cells had been incapacitated. He then perturbed the    muscle to stimulate regeneration. As the muscle healed, the    cells created new muscle tissue, which the mouses nerves    innervated to make a functioning muscle. Its exactly the size    of the muscles Pomerantz needs for full articulation of    expression and function in a human face or hand.  
    Muscles are part of a vast and intricate system strewn    throughoutthe body. Teeth, on the other hand, are islands    unto themselves. Teeth intrigue me from a regeneration    perspective, says OphirKlein, MD, PhD, chair of the    Division of Craniofacial Anomalies, the    Hillblom Professor of Craniofacial Anomalies, the Epstein    Professor of Human Genetics, and a resident alumnus. They are    discrete organs  all the parts are there. More intriguing    still is the fact that many rodents have the ability to grow    their front teeth continuously. Elephants and walruses also    have ever-growing tusks, and even some primates  lemurs  can    regrow their teeth.  
      In studying species that can [regrow teeth], we hope to      unlock the regenerative potential in our own cells.    
      Ophir Klein, MD, PhD    
      Chair of the Division of Craniofacial Anomalies    
    A tooth can be regenerated in parts. Stem cells can be used to    grow the root, and then a crown can be added to complete the    tooth. To generate a whole organ at once, Kleins colleagues    are planning to partner with bioengineers who can produce a    biocompatible material that could serve as a framing device to    jump-start the creation of dentin, one of the hard components    of a tooth. If they start with the right cells, then the    scaffolding will give the cellsthe shape information they    need to create the right design. But even that isnt Kleins    endgame. In my lab, were interested in figuring out why    humans cant regrow teeth, he says. In studying species that    can, we hope to unlock the regenerative potential in our own    cells that might be turned off.  
    Kleins work to generate teeth is inspired by his patients with    ectodermal dysplasia, a congenital disorder characterized by    lack of sweat glands, hair, or teeth. Being able to generate    the roots of teeth would be remarkable for these patients,    since the rest can be done with a crown. Right now, they must    be fitted with dentures.  
    Klein is also taking another tack to help these patients. We    completed a clinical trial of a drug that basically goosed up    the development of the organs when they werent forming    properly, he says. The drug  a protein developed by Swiss    collaborators of Kleins, based on studies of embryonic mice,    who develop theseorgans in early- to mid-gestation  was    given to infants with the disorder right after birth. The trial    was unsuccessful. Now, scientists in Germany are running a    trial of the same drug, giving it instead to mothers carrying    babies with this genetic disorder. The scientists will try to    gauge what the best timing is for delivering the drug.  
    Whats great about this drug is that it doesnt seem to have    any effects on any other organs besides teeth,hair, and    sweat glands, says Klein. Drugs for other conditions are far    riskier, because they affect pathways that are important    inthe development of many organs.  
    Sarah Knox, PhD, an assistant professor of cell and tissue    biology, is using stem cells to figure out howto    regenerate salivary glands compromised by radiation treatments    for head and neckcancers or by craniofacial deformities.    Her focus is on how the environment contributes to the    activation and maintenance ofthe gland. The salivary    gland, like all organs, is continuously replenishing the supply    ofcells and tissues it needs to function. Knoxs research    shows that the gland takesdirectional cues from nearby    nerve cells not only to remain functional, but also to    continuously replace itself. Her organoids are made of cells    from a patient and nerve cells (ganglia) from a fetal mouse.    We are trying to explore the relationship between the stem    cells and the nerves, she says. How do the nerves know the    tissue is there? How do the nerves provide instruction and    feedback? Individual cells die off and new cells have to    replace them. Organoids are giving us insight as to where those    new cells are coming from and how we keep repopulating [them]    all our lives.  
    As head of the UCSF Program in Craniofacial Biology     which is based in the School of Dentistry and the Division of    Genetics in the School of Medicine  Klein stands at one of    sciences most compelling crossroads: regenerative medicine and    genetics. Far in the future, both fields have potential that    seem like science fiction today. We live in a world where    people die waiting for organ transplants. What if we could pull    these organoids from their petri dish and supply them with the    fuel they need to become full-blown organs? Such a feat would    necessitate either a host embryo  perhaps from apig,    because pigs have organs the size of human organs  or some    other biological foundation. Some scientists are hoping to    jump-start organ development with scaffolding, or cells    engineered to speed the developmental process. Others are    zeroing in on the genome, particularly in kids with    craniofacial anomalies caused by just one mutation, like    craniofrontonasal syndrome; for example, a tool called CRISPR    could allow scientists to splice that gene out and replace it    with a normal gene. But the tool has yet to be used in humans,    let alone a human fetus.  
    Ethical questions pepper either route. At their best, stem    cells regenerate tissues; at their worst, they go rogue and    grow into a tumor. Yet with gene editing tools like CRISPR,    you literally have the potential to change the species, says    Klein. And in both scenarios, the cells can act with unforeseen    off-target effects. Klein and his colleagues are in continual    discussion about the repercussions of their work with the    director of UCSF Bioethics, Barbara Koenig, RN, PhD 88. Gene therapy is an    example of an exciting new treatment that cured one serious    pediatric illness  severe combined immunodeficiency syndrome    (SCID)  but the genes unwittingly led to the development of    leukemia, explains Koenig. Genetic and stem cell    interventions must be painstakingly studied before application.    And, once they are ready, who will regulate them?    Thereare many questions yet to be answered. The    challenges are most extreme when we talk about modifying an egg    or sperm cell, where the changes are passed on to the next    generation.  
    So Klein and his colleagues proceed with caution, curiosity,    and awe. The next decade will be an incredibly exciting time,    says Klein. With continual advances in human genetics and    developmental and cell biology, we hope to be able to make    drugs and use genetic tools to appreciably change the lives of    our patients.  
      Bone grows like a runaway train in Edward Hsiaos patients      with fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP). The      slightest bump or injury can set off a spurt of bone growth      that can fuse their vertebrae, lock their joints, or even      freeze up their rib cages, leaving them unable to breathe.    
      No one, to date, has successfully engineered bone. Hsiao, MD,      PhD, is hoping to spark the process with the help of a 3-D      printer from Organovo, a firm that specializes in bioprinting      technology. From iPSCs, he can make many of the essential      ingredients of bone, including mesenchymal stem cells,      endothelial cells, and macrophages. We are putting cells      into the equivalent of an ink. Then we will print the      structures with the ink, let the ink dissolve, and leave the      cells, explains Hsiao. The hope is that the cells can then      recapitulate the normal developmental process.    
      If the approach is successful, Hsiao hopes to use      the resulting models to test drugs and other treatments to      halt or prevent bone deformities. Down the line, his progress      also stands to transform bone and joint replacements. Through      his work with FOP, hes uncovered one mechanism that drives      rapid bone growth. In these patients, we know that mature      bone formation can happen in as quickly as two weeks, so it      is possible to grow bone in an adult. We need to understand      how to modulate that, says Hsiao. Someday, my dream would      be to be able to identify the cells we need, give someone a      drug that induces the right genes and recruits the right      cells to the correct site, and have the cells rebuild the      joint from scratch.    
More here:
Sowing Stem Cells: Lab-Grown Organoids Hold Promise for Patient Treatments - UCSF News Services